Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

2 Questions. Vmca & Vmcg

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

2 Questions. Vmca & Vmcg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Jan 2007, 14:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2 Questions. Vmca & Vmcg

1. Why do they always ask in a interview how will Vmca change with weight and altitude etc. But Vmca is at fix conditions so how can it change ??? surely only Vmc can change. Doesnt matter what change Vmca will stay the same. Is that correct ?

2. Is it correct to say Vmcg is always more that Vmca due to the fact that you cannot bank 5 degrees on the ground ??

Please help !
Happydays is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2007, 15:06
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
control speeds

1. Vmcg & Vmca are affected by changes in altitude/temperature as these affect the amount of thrust being prodused by the engines. The less the thrust being produced, the lower the control speed.

2. Vmcg is a higher speed than Vmca as when on the ground the aircraft rotates around its main undercarriage which is aft of the cg. This gives a shorter rudder arm (flight mechanics), it is therefore required that Vmcg is higher to allow directional control to be maintained.

Hope that helps!
n90bar is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2007, 15:16
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you, Answer number 2 aswer my question. And you are most probably correct about Vmca and Vmcg that can change. As far as I understand it Vmca is at a set condition. 8 factors according to the definition. And a red line on most light a/c
Happydays is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2007, 15:28
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
By "set conditions" i assume you mean:-

1) Max available TO power or thrust,
2) Aircraft trimmed for TO,
3) Most unfavourable CG position,
4) max sea level TO weight,
5) Aircraft in most critical TO configiration with the gear up,
6) The aircraft airborne and ground effects negligble,
7) for props - the inoperative engine prop windmilling or feathered.

These criteria are used to determine Vmca.
n90bar is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2007, 16:13
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes thats it. So if that is the conditions will it then be correct to say it cant change. Only VMC can ?
Happydays is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2007, 17:24
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the hold
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Happydays, VMCA (Minimum control speed airbourne) does change dependant on, most importantly, altitude and temperature. Bear in mind that two of the most essential conditions used to determine VMCA are FULL thrust on the remaining engine(s) and FULL rudder deflection to control the asymetric condition.

To keep it simple, an engine is producing less thrust when firewalled at 35000' than it is at 5000' (due to, amongst other things, a reduction in air density) resulting in a decrease in the minimum control speed. So, whilst full thrust is applied in both instances, external conditions dictate that the actual value of the thrust being produced is less at altitude. In effect, the rudder is more effective and is able to control the aircraft to a lower speed.

The conditions used to determine VMCA are set, but the nature of the conditions change with variations in things such as altitude, temperature, density etc.

Hope this helps.
GD.

Last edited by Go_Detent; 18th Jan 2007 at 17:40.
Go_Detent is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2007, 18:16
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good grief.

This, again.

There is NO REASON why Vmca or Vmcg should be a higher speed. Either is possible; we have aircraft built and certified to the exact same regulations which have one higher sometimes, or the other.

The aerodynamic condition of the aircraft is different; rudder power at alpha ~0 on the ground can be VERY different to that at high AoAs and low speeds in flight.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2007, 18:18
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by n90bar
By "set conditions" i assume you mean:-
1) Max available TO power or thrust,
2) Aircraft trimmed for TO,
3) Most unfavourable CG position,
4) max sea level TO weight, no; Vmca is applicable at the MINIMUM flight weight, usually
5) Aircraft in most critical TO configiration with the gear up,
6) The aircraft airborne and ground effects negligble,
7) for props - the inoperative engine prop windmilling or feathered.
These criteria are used to determine Vmca.
FAR 25.149 and equivalent JAR give the precise requirements, and the Flight Test Guides (such as AC25-7A) provide more background on how to test and analyse the results.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2007, 18:22
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And to address the "is VMCA fixed" question.

It is permissible to schedule VMCA (and VMCG) with altitude and temperature, to reflect the reduction in engine thrust that results, so as to avoid excessive penalties to hot/high operations.

But it IS true that VMCA is "set" in the sense that once determined for a give alt/temp, it is then applied for all instances of that temp/alt. That is, heavy aircraft must use the VMC(A/G) applicable to a light aircraft; you can't schedule with aircraft weight.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2007, 21:17
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Go_Detent
The conditions used to determine VMCA are set, but the nature of the conditions change with variations in things such as altitude, temperature, density etc.
GD.
If the nature of the conditions change dont you call it Vmc then, and not Vmca anymore ? What does Vmc mean then ?
Happydays is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2007, 22:15
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Happydays
If the nature of the conditions change dont you call it Vmc then, and not Vmca anymore ? What does Vmc mean then ?
No.

If you look at, for example, FAR 25.149, the terms used are actually:

VMC
VMCG
VMCL
VMCL-2

The term VMCA actually doesn't occur.

In fact, the term VMCA is how people usually refer to VMC in the context of FAR 25 (for example, we state VMCA in our certification reports, yet there's really no such thing in regs, to be pedantic); bear in mind that VMCL and VMCL-2 are later additions, and so it didn't use to be necessary to clarify "which VMC"


You need to distinguish between "certification Vmcx" and "actual Vmcx" - for EACH of the minimum control speeds (a, g or l) there is a certification level and a real level. "VMC" is just a shorthand for "VMCA" and doesn't signify real versus certified.

And, as our esteemed moderate always reminds us, the real value can sometimes be HIGHER than the certified one.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2007, 23:45
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the hold
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the nature of the conditions change dont you call it Vmc then, and not Vmca anymore ? What does Vmc mean then ?
From a pilot's point of view (i.e. oversimplisitc!!), I've only ever understood the following:

VMCG to be the minumum control speed ON THE GROUND
VMCA
to be the miminum control speed 'airbourne', although I agree this term is a little vague.
VMCL to be the minimum control speed in the landing configuration, which, although technically still airbourne, is likely to be a different (lesser) speed than VMCA, with high lift and drag devices out and a significantly augmented wing shape.

As demonstrated by the last post, things can all get very detailed very quickly on this subject
Go_Detent is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2007, 17:53
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But it IS true that VMCA is "set" in the sense that once determined for a give alt/temp, it is then applied for all instances of that temp/alt. That is, heavy aircraft must use the VMC(A/G) applicable to a light aircraft; you can't schedule with aircraft weight.
MINIMUM VR

Altitude: Sea Level and below
OAT WEIGHT (kg)
(°C) 24000 26000 28000 30000 32000 34000 36000 38000
10 98 96 95 95 96 96 96 97
15 98 95 95 95 95 96 96 96
20 98 95 95 95 95 96 96 96
25 98 95 95 95 95 96 96 96
30 98 95 95 95 95 95 96 96
35 94 92 92 92 93 93 93 94
40 90 89 90 90 90 90 91 91
45 87 87 87 87 87 88 88 88
50 84 84 84 84 85 85 85 86


From an AOM near me.

Although it's min VR in this manual in the FAA version the tables are VMCA and a knot or two lower.

So it looks like you can factor weight into the mix.
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2007, 21:49
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those don't look like any kind of Vmca to me.

If you notice, for some cases the speed increases with increasing weight, for others it decreases. If it was Vmca scheduled with weight it would be decreasing as the weight increases. It's a very odd behaviour if it is Vmca. In fact, sometimes the minimum speed occurs at a mid weight. I'm confused.

You couldn't share the identity of the type concerned, perhaps? It might explain what's happening.

Looking at Ac25-7A, it's fairly clear that altitude and temperature are the only variables allowed for scheduling Vmca:
If, at the option of the applicant, the AFM value of VMCA is to vary with pressure altitude and temperature, the test day minimum control speed and the corresponding thrust should be used to calculate an equivalent yawing moment coefficient (CN). This CN value may then be used to calculate VMCA as a function of takeoff thrust, thus permitting VMCA to be scheduled as a function of pressure altitude and temperature for takeoff data expansion and presentation in the AFM
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2007, 06:50
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for all the info, but I am still not convinced Vmca can change. If it can change by weight the definition will not include "Max all up weight" as one of the factors. Why do we do a Vmc demonstration in a twin aircraft then ? We might as well then do a Vmca demonstration. The Vmc demonstration is to show that the speed that you loose control is actually diffirent from Vmca due to the fact that the "set conditions" is now changing, is that not correct then ? That is also why Vmc is ALWAYS less than Vmca.
Happydays is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2007, 14:09
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The "max all up weight" in the definition is wrong.

If you check the Flight Test Guide for FAR 25 (AC25-7A) it says:

To determine VMCA, use the configuration specified in § 25.149, except that VMCA is normally determined at minimum weight in order to minimize the stall speed and because static VMCA decreases with increased weight if a 5-degree bank angle is used.
Additionally, the same document states (in the introduction to the minimum control speed section:

Explanation. Section 25.149 defines requirements for minimum control speeds during takeoff climb (VMC), during takeoff ground roll (VMCG), and during approach and landing (VMCL and VMCL-2). The VMC (commonly referred to as VMCA) requirements are specified in §§ 25.149(a), (b), (c) and (d); the VMCG requirements are described in § 25.149(e); and the VMCL and VMCL-2 requirements are covered in §§ 25.149(f), (g) and (h).
(Those are on about page 91 of the copy I have, by the way)

VMC and VMCA are used interchangeably in the FAR 25 world.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2007, 20:30
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ahem.

FAR 23.149 - MTOW is correct. For part 23 aircraft. Probably what n90bar and others are quoting.

But now I've learned something. Light aircraft interview - VMCA doesn't change with weight (legally speaking). Airline interview - VMCA may change with weight, in accordance with ...

Regards,
O8
Oktas8 is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2007, 20:48
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VMCA
Engine: CF34-8E5A1 – T/O-1
Altitude: Sea Level and below
OAT WEIGHT (lb)
(°C) 47000 50000 55000 60000 65000 70000 75000 80000
10 97 95 92 89 86 83 80 76
15 97 95 92 89 86 83 79 76
20 97 95 92 89 86 83 79 76
25 97 95 92 89 86 83 79 76
30 97 95 92 89 86 82 79 76
35 93 91 88 85 81 78 74 71
40 89 87 84 80 77 73 69 65
45 85 83 79 76 72 68 64 60
50 80 78 74 71 67 63 58 55


these figures are from the FAA version.
ERJ 170-100

The EASA manual has min vr which is not always limited by vmca.
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2007, 21:22
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Oktas8
Ahem.
FAR 23.149 - MTOW is correct. For part 23 aircraft. Probably what n90bar and others are quoting.
Originally Posted by Part 23
§ 23.149 Minimum control speed.
(b) VMC for takeoff must not exceed 1.2 VS1, where VS1 is determined at the maximum takeoff weight. VMC must be determined with the most unfavorable weight and center of gravity position and with the airplane airborne and the ground effect negligible, for the takeoff configuration(s) with—
....
Originally Posted by Part 25
§ 25.149 Minimum control speed
....
(c) VMC may not exceed 1.13 VSR with—
....
(4) The maximum sea level takeoff weight (or any lesser weight necessary to show VMC);
...
Actually, Part 23 is better worded, because it avoids the nonsense wording about MTOW. The most unfavourable weight for VMC is the lightest weight, unless your weight /cg envelope is ridiculously skewed, such that the most aft cg is much further aft than the light weight case, and even in such a case you'd struggle to convinvce the regulators that anything except lightest weight and furthest aft in combination be tested.


Interesting that those data are for the E170. I note its for T/O-1 thrust, which I assume is a flex/derate setting. I seem to recall hearing that Embraer was using a variable rating system on the engines, such that they were adjusting the engine power for the conditions required, and then scheduling VMCs for THAT thrust.

So, technically, they are not scheduling VMC with weight. They're scheduling thrust with weight (probably to achieve a fixed or near-fixed level of performance, which means a roughly constant T/W) and then using the lower thrusts which naturally occur at lower weights to schedule VMC accordingly. That would explain why the values vary slightly up and down for the same OAT - it's not a perfect balance, sometimes the thrust reduction is big enough to outweigh the light weight effect, sometimes not.

Is there a corresponding table for the full rated thrust case, or is it a single value?

oops, sorry, I didnt look closely at the numbers, just the model, and assumed it was the same data. it's not.
scratches head
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2007, 21:48
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thrust on the EJETS

On the Ejets the engine thrust is rated as TO1 TO2 and TO3. These are fixed ratings. They also use ATTCS and you can derate using Assumed Temp method up to 25% of the rated thrust.

In the engine failure case the FADEC will set TOX reserve thrust on the running engine. TO1 reserve and TO2 reserve are the same thrust and share the same VMCG/VMCA (V1min/VRmin) data. TO3 reserve is less and has lower VMCG/A speeds.

Its not possible to select higher than TO3 reserve until you are out of the take off phase to ensure you respect the lower VMC used in the TO calc.

But as you can see from the data VMCA(and vmcg) is scheduled according to alt, temp and weight.
FE Hoppy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.