Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

737 External Air Starts

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

737 External Air Starts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Jan 2007, 01:31
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: london
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
737 External Air Starts

Could someone help with this?

(737 Classic) In the ops manual I looked up, it states that when using External Air and GPU for engine start, you MUST start Eng 1 first.

In some airports, the GPU cable is coming from the airbridge and it is not long enough to reach the receptacle without being within less than 3 meters from Eng 1 inlet. The ground crew asks for Eng 2 to start first.

I looked in the books and I could not find any serious implications from starting 2, push back and x-bleed 1. The only obvious implication is the black and white EADI & EHSI (they loose the colours due to reduced equipment cooling I think.)

Two start-push-xbleeds occured the last few weeks with 2 then 1 sequence with no problems.

Why the manual (at least the one I saw) says MUST? It does not even say should or "recomended".

Any ideas?
Thanks a lot.
gonso is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2007, 07:47
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: High Skies
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Safety!

I think it's just because the jet air start equipment is hooked up from the right side. Thus, you start engine-1 first, and then you let the ground crew diconnect the jet start before you x-beeld engine-2.

Simply, it's just for ground personnel safety!

regards,
_FL600_ is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2007, 14:17
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Block
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have to agree with FL600. As long as the duct pressure is sufficient, it mechanically doesn’t matter which engine is started first.
TolTol is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2007, 15:25
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 495
Received 11 Likes on 1 Post
The above responses are correct. Next time you do a walkaround have a look to see where the external air (for engine starting not ground air conditioning!) plugs into. It is a hatch just beneath & behind the leading edge of the RH wing. There is no way that you could safely get to this hatch with the #2 engine running.

S&L
CaptainSandL is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2007, 23:40
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: london
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the replies chaps.

The problem is that in those two cases I am referring to, it was the ground crew that insisted on No2 to start first. In other words, they were happier to approach the inlet near the No2, than start the No1 which was literally a few feet from the airbrdge. So it is possible for No2 to start.

I was aware of the inlet geometry, I was just wondering whether there were additional reasons behind the manual's "MUST" .
gonso is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.