Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

IR (infrared) night vision video - amazing!

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

IR (infrared) night vision video - amazing!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Jan 2007, 01:11
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cat C aircraft approach minimums at KASE are 2400 and 3. So the last minute or two of any approach will be visual at Aspen.
http://www.fboweb.com/dpp/05889LDE.PDF

http://www.fboweb.com/fb40/airport/ASE.html
RobertS975 is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2007, 02:24
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pergatory
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by npasque
very nice. from watching the video, i believe the IR provides somewhat of an illusion which leads you to believe that you are higher than you actually are. comparing the two (IR and normal), i would have placed at least a 500ft difference between the two at many stages of the approach (again, that illusion).
Part of that is the misalignment of the cameras, and part of it is the difference in the field of view (FOV) in each. Look at the video after they land and notice the difference. The "witness" camera (the one on the right side of the video) could have been better aligned.
formulaben is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2007, 02:32
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pergatory
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Double Zero
It might be of interest to know these night vision devices have a short life - less than 50 hours - and fail without warning...might have been better off without them !

Luckily mine failed ( somewhat prematurely I felt regarding the cost, though naturally about a second after the guarantee expired ) on my boat so I was able to pull up in time, but I'd think long & hard before flying even with latest standard NVG's.

As mentioned, they also give a wierd aspect, and are notorious in the military for restricting peripheral vision - important if one's trying to hover a Harrier - no, the nearest I'll get to that is a sim, but I knew Test Pilots who complained about it...

Also the cabin lighting has to be compatible.

DZ
The technology you are talking about is NVS. This video is EVS which is an Infra-Red based video which is TOTALLY DIFFERENT. The MTBF (meam time between failures) for modern (uncooled) EVS technology is measured in THOUSANDS of hours.
formulaben is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2007, 02:42
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, if there is a modestly high (but acceptable) failure rate, simply do what is done with Radar and Transponder/TCAS, carry a second system!

Regards,

Old Smokey
Old Smokey is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.