Fuel Burn rates - fixed wing
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: North East
Fuel Burn rates - fixed wing
I am looking to establish the fuel burn rates per hour (approx) and was hoping someone with more knowledge than I could assist with the figures. The aircraft I am looking for are as follows:
737
757
777
A320
A319
Bae146
Saab 2000
328
ATR42/72
CRJ200
Any help would be appreciated.
Cheers
737
757
777
A320
A319
Bae146
Saab 2000
328
ATR42/72
CRJ200
Any help would be appreciated.
Cheers
Vacuum Powered

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Sussex

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
From: ex-DXB
Smells like an anti-gasoline Journo to me.
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: North East
Sorry to dissapoint you alibaba - theres nothing quite as underhand going on believe me.
I am a broker with a ppl and was after the figures for a piece of work I have on the go and its nothing to do with journos.
I am only after approx figures and have bizjet figures from the BBGA handbook - e.g. 1200 Lb/h for a 125, 2853 for a Global - but i cant get the larger stuff.
For info, the BBGA assume 75% of power at optimum altitude.
Any help appreciated
I am a broker with a ppl and was after the figures for a piece of work I have on the go and its nothing to do with journos.
I am only after approx figures and have bizjet figures from the BBGA handbook - e.g. 1200 Lb/h for a 125, 2853 for a Global - but i cant get the larger stuff.
For info, the BBGA assume 75% of power at optimum altitude.
Any help appreciated
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
From: fairly close to the colonial capitol
RR powered 757:
At FL370 using long range cruise:
90000kg = 1600kg/eng/hour
60000kg = 1200kg/eng/hour
JT8s on a 737-200
At FL330 using LRC:
45000kg = 1200kg/eng/hour
34000kg = 850kg/eng/hour
At FL370 using long range cruise:
90000kg = 1600kg/eng/hour
60000kg = 1200kg/eng/hour
JT8s on a 737-200

At FL330 using LRC:
45000kg = 1200kg/eng/hour
34000kg = 850kg/eng/hour
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: North East
Thanks to everyone for the info.
I have come acorss the following info from other sources, can anyone confirm if these look anywhere near close?
Boeing 767-300ER Cons : 4000 kg per hour
Boeing 777-200ER Cons : 5500 KG per hour
Boeing 757-300 Cons : 3000 KG pe hour
Airbus 330-200 : 6000 kg PH
Airbus 310-300 & 300-600R : 5000 kg PH
Airbus 300B4-200 : 6000KG PH
Airbus 340-200 & 300 : 6000kg ph
Cheers
I have come acorss the following info from other sources, can anyone confirm if these look anywhere near close?
Boeing 767-300ER Cons : 4000 kg per hour
Boeing 777-200ER Cons : 5500 KG per hour
Boeing 757-300 Cons : 3000 KG pe hour
Airbus 330-200 : 6000 kg PH
Airbus 310-300 & 300-600R : 5000 kg PH
Airbus 300B4-200 : 6000KG PH
Airbus 340-200 & 300 : 6000kg ph
Cheers
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: the Milky Way
A320, FL mid-upper 300's, M0.78, with about 150 pax: 2300-2400 kg per hour.
BAe146, FL280, M0.65 about 70 pax, about 2000-2200 kg per hour. At M0.7 about 2400kg.
Bae 146 burns more overall though on a comparable distance sector due to very slow to reach an efficient altitude and takes much longer to cover same distance. And with half the pax
BAe146, FL280, M0.65 about 70 pax, about 2000-2200 kg per hour. At M0.7 about 2400kg.
Bae 146 burns more overall though on a comparable distance sector due to very slow to reach an efficient altitude and takes much longer to cover same distance. And with half the pax




