Fuel Burn rates - fixed wing
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North East
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fuel Burn rates - fixed wing
I am looking to establish the fuel burn rates per hour (approx) and was hoping someone with more knowledge than I could assist with the figures. The aircraft I am looking for are as follows:
737
757
777
A320
A319
Bae146
Saab 2000
328
ATR42/72
CRJ200
Any help would be appreciated.
Cheers
737
757
777
A320
A319
Bae146
Saab 2000
328
ATR42/72
CRJ200
Any help would be appreciated.
Cheers
Vacuum Powered
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sussex
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: ex-DXB
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Smells like an anti-gasoline Journo to me.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North East
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry to dissapoint you alibaba - theres nothing quite as underhand going on believe me.
I am a broker with a ppl and was after the figures for a piece of work I have on the go and its nothing to do with journos.
I am only after approx figures and have bizjet figures from the BBGA handbook - e.g. 1200 Lb/h for a 125, 2853 for a Global - but i cant get the larger stuff.
For info, the BBGA assume 75% of power at optimum altitude.
Any help appreciated
I am a broker with a ppl and was after the figures for a piece of work I have on the go and its nothing to do with journos.
I am only after approx figures and have bizjet figures from the BBGA handbook - e.g. 1200 Lb/h for a 125, 2853 for a Global - but i cant get the larger stuff.
For info, the BBGA assume 75% of power at optimum altitude.
Any help appreciated
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 55
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RR powered 757:
At FL370 using long range cruise:
90000kg = 1600kg/eng/hour
60000kg = 1200kg/eng/hour
JT8s on a 737-200
At FL330 using LRC:
45000kg = 1200kg/eng/hour
34000kg = 850kg/eng/hour
At FL370 using long range cruise:
90000kg = 1600kg/eng/hour
60000kg = 1200kg/eng/hour
JT8s on a 737-200
At FL330 using LRC:
45000kg = 1200kg/eng/hour
34000kg = 850kg/eng/hour
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North East
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks to everyone for the info.
I have come acorss the following info from other sources, can anyone confirm if these look anywhere near close?
Boeing 767-300ER Cons : 4000 kg per hour
Boeing 777-200ER Cons : 5500 KG per hour
Boeing 757-300 Cons : 3000 KG pe hour
Airbus 330-200 : 6000 kg PH
Airbus 310-300 & 300-600R : 5000 kg PH
Airbus 300B4-200 : 6000KG PH
Airbus 340-200 & 300 : 6000kg ph
Cheers
I have come acorss the following info from other sources, can anyone confirm if these look anywhere near close?
Boeing 767-300ER Cons : 4000 kg per hour
Boeing 777-200ER Cons : 5500 KG per hour
Boeing 757-300 Cons : 3000 KG pe hour
Airbus 330-200 : 6000 kg PH
Airbus 310-300 & 300-600R : 5000 kg PH
Airbus 300B4-200 : 6000KG PH
Airbus 340-200 & 300 : 6000kg ph
Cheers
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the Milky Way
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A320, FL mid-upper 300's, M0.78, with about 150 pax: 2300-2400 kg per hour.
BAe146, FL280, M0.65 about 70 pax, about 2000-2200 kg per hour. At M0.7 about 2400kg.
Bae 146 burns more overall though on a comparable distance sector due to very slow to reach an efficient altitude and takes much longer to cover same distance. And with half the pax
BAe146, FL280, M0.65 about 70 pax, about 2000-2200 kg per hour. At M0.7 about 2400kg.
Bae 146 burns more overall though on a comparable distance sector due to very slow to reach an efficient altitude and takes much longer to cover same distance. And with half the pax
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NZWN New Zealand
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am trying to convince a young friend in USA who wants to create an airline to go with an ATR rather than an EMB-120 Brazillia.... Anybody know the Brazillia's fuel flow please ?