Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Max approach angle for CATII/III

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Max approach angle for CATII/III

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th October 2006 | 16:38
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
From: Leeds
Max approach angle for CATII/III

Would anyone be so kind as to confirm the maximum permitted glideslope angle for both CATII and CATIII approaches.

My local field has a 3.5 degree approach due to highish ground 1.5nm from the threshold. This was established back in the 80s after a runway extension and although the ground is no lower (or higher) than it was then, I am led to believe the CAA have now approved a reduction in the g/s to allow the ILS to be upgraded to CATII.

My conclusion from this is that (a) CATII/III not approved at 3.5 degrees, (b) CATII approved at somewhere between 3.0 and 3.49 degrees, but not CATIII. Interested to know whether there is any definitive guidance on this and, if the above hypothesis is correct, why CATIII is limited to 3 degrees.
Thanks
682ft AMSL is offline  
Reply
Old 19th October 2006 | 17:29
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
From: UK
Answer is in PANSOPS I believe and refers to calculation of DH/A for ILS being based on GP between 2.5 and 3.5 but a max of 3 for cat 2/3 ops.

I'll try and dig out a reference.
FlapsOne is offline  
Reply
Old 19th October 2006 | 17:30
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 198
Likes: 1
From: france
cat2 & 3 glide path angle

hello 682 amsl,

performance criteria for ils cat2 & cat3 are contained in icao document annex 10 & ecac document n° 17.

a summary of these requirements is as follows:

ils system is approved : beam bends within limits.
glide path angle between 2.5 & 3.25 degrees.
satisfactory power & transmission back-ups, with correct switch over time to standby system.
automatic signal-in-space monitoring.
the ils reference datum height is at least 49ft.
rwy width min. 45m & satisfactory length.
approach terrain profile checked & satisfactory.
in order to prevent electromagnetic interferences, establish ils critical area's etc... . ( cat2/3 holding positions, eg.)
blackmail is offline  
Reply
Old 19th October 2006 | 18:54
  #4 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,458
Likes: 368
From: Wildest Surrey
ICAO Doc 8168 para 3.5.6.1 sub para e):
glide path angle:
minimum 2.5 deg
optimum 3 deg
maximum 3.5 deg (3 deg for cat II/III operations)
And to add to Blackmail's list:
supplementary approach lighting and touchdown zone lighting.
chevvron is offline  
Reply
Old 19th October 2006 | 23:01
  #5 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 2
From: Seattle
Check your company's certification for each aircraft. Our 747s are certified to 2.5 - 3.25 degrees.
Intruder is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd October 2006 | 12:09
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 38
From: Long ago and far away ......
Ditto UK B777s.
MrBernoulli is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd October 2006 | 16:23
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,809
Likes: 0
From: Bothell WA
HGS

On the Headsup Guidance System (HGS) or HUD the range is 2.51 to 3.00
TR4A is offline  
Reply
Old 18th February 2014 | 13:47
  #8 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: The Clacker
Max angle for cat 1 ILS?

I've seen 3.5 degrees quoted all over the place for maximum ILS angle, but Marseille 31R is 4.0 deg, and LCY is 5.5!

Are these special exemptions or what is the actual max angle? (cat 1 not cat 2/3)
keep_her_lit is offline  
Reply
Old 18th February 2014 | 15:00
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
From: FL410
Approach minima's need to be adjusted higher to take account of the increased vertical closure rate and proximity to ground in case of missed approach execution at minimums. Hence a steeper angle can be constructed if required due terrain for instance, but with higher then normal (200' AGL) minima
Skyjob is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.