Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Spruce Goose a WIG Aircraft?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Spruce Goose a WIG Aircraft?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 15:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London, England
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spruce Goose a WIG Aircraft?

I know it's not exactly topical but I recently read an article on Russian Ekranoplanes (Wing in Ground Effect aircraft). I'm also reading a Howard Hughes biography. My question is this; Has it ever been established whether the Spruce Goose had enough power to climb out of the Ground Effect or was it's short flight a one-off because it couldn't?
VS1711 is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 16:09
  #2 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm fairly sure that if it had the power to lift off out of the water, it could have climbed out of ground effect. I think the short flight was a checkpoint on the development program where Hughes earned a large ongoing payment from the government for the program for having actually flown the thing. The reasons for the cancellation could be anybody's guess- it has always been a mystery and were never revealed. I suspect the government maybe had let Hughes know they had lost interest.
Rainboe is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 16:26
  #3 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,399
Received 1,589 Likes on 726 Posts
The only flight stayed so low and was for such a short time because it was totally unauthorised for the exercise, which was a taxi trial. When the chief designer later asked Hughes whether he actually meant to lift it off the water, Hughes replied, "You'll never know." It is generally thought he did it deliberately just to prove it could fly to the critics, but with an excuse where he could deny it was deliberate.

Could it have flown out of ground effect? Undoubtedly, whilst it is said to have been underpowered, if it had the thrust to break the water suction and get airborne it undoubtedly had the power to climb well out of ground effect, particularly without a cargo payload onboard, and probably get close to its planned ceiling of around 29,000ft.

But even true WIG aircraft can operate out of ground effect, the Ekranoplan had a ceiling of over 24,000ft. They are just not very efficient out of their design envelope.
ORAC is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 16:41
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: DUBLIN
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi i also read the Hughs auto bio.

I enjoyed it very much, he was a true lover of aviation, all be it a bit of a freak when it came to hygeine etc.

And i cant believe you called it the Spruce goose... Mr Hughes hated that, its the Hercules! : )

The plane did fly, even though it wasnt for very long. He was ment to bring it out for a taxi run, but he couldnt resist, so the let it fly for a few seconds then landed again.

Have a good weekend.
DUB-GREG is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2006, 04:26
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1998
Location: Formerly of Nam
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

I read the book too and reckon it mustve been a bloodey top emotion indeed for Hughes as the Hercules lifted off the water - to go through the political and bureucratic crap he did and still get it to fly. Mustve been the bestest feeling in the world!
Slasher is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2006, 13:01
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: France
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the same context, I seem to remember the Dornier Do-X flew some of its long distance trips in ground effect, not because it couldn't climb out of it (it could), but because it gave a longer range
ChristiaanJ is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2006, 14:36
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: still in bed
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DUB-GREG
Hi i also read the Hughs auto bio.

I enjoyed it very much, he was a true lover of aviation, all be it a bit of a freak when it came to hygeine etc.

And i cant believe you called it the Spruce goose... Mr Hughes hated that, its the Hercules! : )

The plane did fly, even though it wasnt for very long. He was ment to bring it out for a taxi run, but he couldnt resist, so the let it fly for a few seconds then landed again.

Have a good weekend.
Thank you DUB,
Hercules story is now on display in Mc.Minville (OR) at the Evergreen Museum.
Is is splendid. like a 747 SP with ite 8 engines. Hercules is the name but spruce goose become its web ... bye
ZAGORFLY is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2006, 14:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those unfamiliar with the aerodynamic aspects of the H-1 design, might be interested to know that during the brief flight in Long Beach harbour, severe empanage vibrations were noted, and after the aeroplane was docked, and Howard disembarked, he mentioned to one of his desin engineers that...'this thing will never fly again'.

Well known at the time in Southern California aviation circles amongst Hughes employees.
'Tis a fact.
411A is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2006, 13:04
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was designed at a time when very large logistics aircraft were in their infancy, and it used the best propulsion available at the time, but there were still plenty of unknowns. At best it could have been considered an R&D bird.

Without payload, it might possibly have reached 29K before draining the fuel tanks!

The wood construction was of course to overcome a foreseen strategic aluminum shortage, which never fully materialized.

And 224 cylinders, 448 spark plugs????

BTW - model designation was I believe HK-4, for Hughes-Kaiser. I don't recall what shipbuilder Kaiser's involvement was. The H-1 was the famous (or notorious, because competitors refused to race against this ship) prewar racer.

Last edited by barit1; 25th Sep 2006 at 13:18.
barit1 is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2006, 13:38
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Timbukthree
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I too have read about empennage vibrations on the maiden flight, specifically coming from where the vertical stabilizer joined the fuselage.

Flight out-of-ground effect? I think so, just watch the film of the initial flight where the Hercules actually climbs well enough so that Mr. Hughes actually has to input some DOWN control. I don't think that was done to increase airspeed, due to the low altitude. I don't know what flap settings were used, so it may also have been a result of flap retraction and subsequent trim adjustment.
evansb is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2006, 07:20
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, HK-4 is was.

My Dad had a coffee table made from a piece of spar cap, 28-ply Birch.
Beautiful wood, superbly crafted.
As I recall, Henry Kaiser pulled out of the project due to his doubts about Hughes ability to actually get the airplane built.
After all, Kaiser, being one very smart and successful businessman, who was the prime contractor on Hoover Dam (The Six Companies), completed two years ahead of schedule and under budget, had the noteable distinction of having his company build Liberty ships...4 per day were turned out toward the end of the war.
With all that success, Hughes was seen as a liability, I believe.
411A is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2006, 07:30
  #12 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,399
Received 1,589 Likes on 726 Posts
Nomenclature was either HK-1 or H-4.
ORAC is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2006, 12:16
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very interesting!

According to the FAA Civil Aircraft Register - Advisory Circular 20-6D, July 1, 1965 - NX37602 was registered to Reconstruction Finance Corp, the same agency which sold thousands of WWII surplus aircraft after the war. Registers of this vintage generally included thousands of aircraft no longer airworthy.

The type code is 447 01, a Hughes model 10, and the serial number is HK1.
Year of MFG 1947, eight P&W Wasp Major engines.
barit1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.