Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

737NG cargo fire question

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

737NG cargo fire question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Sep 2006, 01:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: melboune
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking 737NG cargo fire question

hello gentlemen.

i have question re: GARGO FIRE on the NG. why is it that one pack must be turn off in this check list?. And in the event that you my be already running on one pack, what do you think the best cause of action might be.

thanks inadvance
pigsmitefly is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 06:28
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 55
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1 pack operation would reduce the airflow through the cargo bay. This action helps retain the inerting gas (halon) in the bay from the discharge bottle(s) for maximum effectiveness.

No packs operation could allow the smoke to enter the passenger cabin. If you are already on 1 pack - no need to change config. Recirc Fans off however.
vapilot2004 is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 08:04
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: melboune
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Thanks VAPilot2004. This makes sense and your reply is appreciated. Cheers
pigsmitefly is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2006, 09:56
  #4 (permalink)  
www.paolodeangelis.com
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Italy
Age: 56
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
reduce the airflow through the cargo bay
???
The cargo bay is pressurized but NOT ventilated, and that's what still keeps me wondering...
Paolo de Angelis is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2006, 07:32
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: right here
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
worries in the mornin'

once again i'm coming to the conclusion, that my B738 manuals are just poor in terms of beyond-basic-layout info.
i mean I DO KNOW those cargo holds are cat C, supposed to be absolutely fire proof untill the crew reaches the next hotel bar. and they are not ventilated. 'used' cabin air and 'used ' eq. cooling air (inflite overboard ehaust valve closed) flows "around the linings" so those dogs etc don't freeze solid.
and the holds DO HAVE some very small pressure exchange mechanism to the outside.
and if u turn one pack off in flight the left recirc quits.
and on the newer B738 in the event of a fwd cargo smoke detection (by the way those cargo 'fire' detectors are only smoke detectors) the eq cooling exhaust fan will stop running while the off-light will be inhibited.

BUT WHY?

air flowing AROUND the cargo hold won't influence some fire on the inside?!?
FCS Explorer is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2006, 08:25
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
air flowing AROUND the cargo hold won't influence some fire on the inside?!?
But ... what about the integrity of the lining? If this were breached by fire/explosion, then prohibiting air flow would be best course. Belt 'n braces I know!
TooL8 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.