Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

DASH 8 400 Spoilers extended before T/O

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

DASH 8 400 Spoilers extended before T/O

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Sep 2006, 08:17
  #1 (permalink)  
www.paolodeangelis.com
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Italy
Age: 56
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DASH 8 400 Spoilers extended before T/O

A few days ago, behind a Dash8 400 ready to takeoff, I told him "XXX you have some spoilers extended"... just in case.

Is it normal, maybe for the first flight of the day? some sort of test?

We saw the spoilers retract upon T/O power application.

Just curious. Thanks
Paolo de Angelis is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2006, 10:50
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: In the Farm
Age: 47
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For some odd reason it is normal practice to put the spoilers up prior to every departure. I fly the thing and I'm not really sure what the point is.?!!!

Its frequent that people mention it as we line up so its great to see people are looking out for us!!!

Another odd 'dashism' !!!
hushkit77 is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2006, 11:11
  #3 (permalink)  
Gender Faculty Specialist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Stop being so stupid, it's Sean's turn
Posts: 1,891
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
It's normal on every flight.

Basically, there is a ground/flight switch on the flight deck, weight on wheels sensors and a Power Lever Angle (PLA), basically a microswitch, which all control the position of the spoilers.

In ground mode the WoW sensors are overridden and the spoilers stay retracted. If you exceed the PLA, about 12 degrees I think, in ground mode (rare as you don't need that much power whilst taxying) the switch will move to flight mode, but the spoilers remain retracted as you are now above the required PLA.

If however, you manually select flight mode with weight on wheels and a PLA of less than 12 (as we do when we line up) the spoilers will extend. This is why you see the spoilers extended prior to take off. And, as you pointed out, they retract on power application as you've now passed the 12 degree PLA microswitch.

When you land, the switch is at flight, you will get weight on wheels AND only when you've reduced past the PLA of 12 the spoilers will extend.

A bizarre system I know but does that make sense?
Chesty Morgan is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2006, 11:27
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not familiar with flying this type but I would imagine it also aids the possibility of a RTO and saves the flightdeck one less task of setting spoilers???
CLEAR4T/O is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2006, 11:36
  #5 (permalink)  
www.paolodeangelis.com
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Italy
Age: 56
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Got it,thanks!
I would imagine the crew has to check for their retraction with a callout or flight controls page?...
Paolo de Angelis is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2006, 11:41
  #6 (permalink)  
Gender Faculty Specialist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Stop being so stupid, it's Sean's turn
Posts: 1,891
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Clear4to, yep that's another reason.

Paolo, yes, there is a powered flying controls indicator permanently on the captains MFD. There is no call as such, but it's SOP to check they go down as they should, but the config warning would (hopefully!) sound if they stayed up. There is a "spoilers" call on landing. We do the full and free check with the spoilers in ground mode as they're also used as roll spoilers.
Chesty Morgan is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2006, 01:11
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flew Dash 7's in the early 1980's. Had the same procedure.

I believe there was a Dash 7 crash in S. America that had spoiler deployment inflight. During training they explained the procedure as "we check the system every flight now. If they don't retract at high power you abort."
misd-agin is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 10:07
  #8 (permalink)  
Gender Faculty Specialist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Stop being so stupid, it's Sean's turn
Posts: 1,891
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Vnav, I'd tend to agree with you. Coming from the 146, as I did, it was a habit of mine to put a lot of into wing aileron in (swept wing and narrowish track undercarriage). On the Dash (Q400) it's not necessary to have the roll spoilers deployed, for the reasons you've stated. And you're also increasing the drag on the upwind wing, enhancing the weathercock effect. I still put a bit of aileron in but not that much.
Chesty Morgan is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 11:10
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: turning inbound
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With the wide track of the Dash, no into wind aileron is required during the t/o roll. Even taking off in maximum allowable crosswind, there is no tendency for a wing to lift.
reptile is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2006, 00:27
  #10 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
WRT into wind aileron/spoiler, rather than put the aileron/spoiler into wind at the commencement of the take-off roll, because that's the way it's always been done, why not just keep the wings level during the take-off roll? In other words, just enough aileron deflection is used to keep the wings level.
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2006, 15:17
  #11 (permalink)  
Gender Faculty Specialist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Stop being so stupid, it's Sean's turn
Posts: 1,891
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Simply because it's easier to keep a wing down than it is to get it back down if it's lifted. That's why.
Chesty Morgan is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2006, 15:37
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chesty Morgan
... they retract on power application as you've now passed the 12 degree PLA microswitch.
Sorry to show my ignorance but...

One microswitch failure and the spoilers don't retract or?
cwatters is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2006, 17:59
  #13 (permalink)  
742
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cwatters
Sorry to show my ignorance but...

One microswitch failure and the spoilers don't retract or?
I never thought much of this practice, and at my previous employer one crew found themselves airborne with one panel stuck up (and no horn). It is not normally that big of a deal if they do not deploy on landing; it is a big deal if they do not all retract on takeoff.

As for why this is done, the story I was given by a test pilot at Downsview was that it had to do with...office politics. I guess that the flight test folks are not free of it either.

As for crosswind technique, is the airplane heavy and performance limited? Or perhaps the runway braking action is less than good? One must adjust technique to fit the situation.
742 is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2006, 18:24
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
XWind Take Off

Originally Posted by reptile
With the wide track of the Dash, no into wind aileron is required during the t/o roll. Even taking off in maximum allowable crosswind, there is no tendency for a wing to lift.
This statement is correct. There is no requirement to put any imput on take off roll. Having been a Dash 8 test pilot for deHavilland, I can assure you this is the method used during testing and certification by senior test pilot on Dash 8 (all models). You will of course require imput once rotation ocurrs so be ready for it.
ltdisd is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2006, 19:59
  #15 (permalink)  
Gender Faculty Specialist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Stop being so stupid, it's Sean's turn
Posts: 1,891
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
One microswitch failure and the spoilers don't retract or?
Erm...never thought of that! I don't know how the system really 'thinks' but I assume that's the reason for us to check they are retracted during the power application.

The situation that 742 describes shouldn't ever happen!
Chesty Morgan is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2006, 01:23
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: F370
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The spoilers should retract as soon as the power levers are advanced (1 switch) but if they don't you will get the takeoff warning horn (separate switch). If you did continue the takeoff and the aircraft lifted off, the spoilers would retract as soon as any weight on wheels switch sensed off the ground. It is pretty safe.
AtoBsafely is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2006, 00:33
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chesty Morgan
Simply because it's easier to keep a wing down than it is to get it back down if it's lifted. That's why.
This topic, control input early or late, never goes out of fashion. The answer I've always heard, beyond technique discussions, is that the a/c aren't certified that way. If you're doing this in a balanced field condition your performance will be worse than demonstrated.

ltdisd vbmenu_register("postmenu_2851336", true);
Probationary PPRuNer

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1


XWind Take Off
Quote:
Originally Posted by reptile
With the wide track of the Dash, no into wind aileron is required during the t/o roll. Even taking off in maximum allowable crosswind, there is no tendency for a wing to lift.

This statement is correct. There is no requirement to put any imput on take off roll. Having been a Dash 8 test pilot for deHavilland, I can assure you this is the method used during testing and certification by senior test pilot on Dash 8 (all models You will of course require imput once rotation ocurrs so be ready for it.
misd-agin is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2006, 01:02
  #18 (permalink)  
Gender Faculty Specialist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Stop being so stupid, it's Sean's turn
Posts: 1,891
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by misd-agin
I can assure you this is the method used during testing and certification by senior test pilot on Dash 8 (all models).
Fine. No need to shout.

The answer I've always heard, beyond technique discussions, is that the a/c aren't certified that way
That must be type specific.
Chesty Morgan is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2006, 20:24
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chesty Morgan
Fine. No need to shout.



That must be type specific.

Just trying highlight his comment and not shout it out.

"Type specific"? I just emailed a guy that should be able to get the answer from a leading manufacturer. If he gets an answer I'll post it.
misd-agin is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2006, 21:04
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The question -

Curiuos if you could ask the flight test guys how a/c are certified for crosswind takeoff's, specifically the use of ailerons to prevent the upwind wing from raising.

Do they start with full control input prior to the start of takeoff roll, feed in aileron to keep the wing level as they accelerate, or don't use any aileron input until rotation starts?

The answer -

Since I am a flight test guy I will answer your question. We recommend that you start at neutral or less than one unit into the wind. Maintain the wings level by correcting when it starts to tilt over. This tends to minimize the amount of crosswind controls at rotation which is important related to tail clearance margins and controllability. The other method, which usually comes from the small airplane types, tends to keep a little wing low into the wind during the roll and rotation and reduces margin. It is also counter intuitive as you are putting input into the airplane when no effect is felt and taking it out as things happen. Not the design philosophy of control. An article in the new Boeing Aero magazine will also point this out soon.

************************************************************ ******************************************

I've also heard it was related to acceleration performance but he makes no mention of this. So I'm not sure if it is related to acceleration performance or not.
misd-agin is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.