Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Aircraft Engines

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Aircraft Engines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th September 2006 | 02:17
  #21 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,581
Likes: 0
From: flyover country USA
I could tell you the grand secret of it all, BAforever, but then I'd have to...

I'll say this much: Donald Nyrop of NWA was steadfast in insisting on JT9D's for his DC-10-20 (later rebranded DC-10-40 for a marketing shell game).

But in the late 80's NWA bought secondhand DC-10-30's from - KLM or SAS I think. After a few weeks of flying -30's the crews were less than eager to go back to -40's.
barit1 is offline  
Reply
Old 16th September 2006 | 11:54
  #22 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: UK
Why is that so? Was it technical performance? More Reliable?
BAforever is offline  
Reply
Old 16th September 2006 | 12:00
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Uk
Its obviously better to fly!!
Theplanemanuk is offline  
Reply
Old 16th September 2006 | 22:23
  #24 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,581
Likes: 0
From: flyover country USA
I think there were a number of issues with the JT9D-59 - starting, stall-free operation, -- I think it was an earlier vintage machine than the CF6-50.

The -50 had been upgraded to the -50C2 by the time NWA acquired these ships.
barit1 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.