Angle of attack indicators -- do we need them?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Angle of attack indicators -- do we need them?
And if so, when would we use them? I guess in most cases during unreliable airspeed or in manouvers at the edge of the flight envelope. Then again flying at the limits in a FBW protected airplane (i.e. the bus) you would probably relie on the protection and not spend time wathcing an AoA indicator.
Those of you who fly Boeing machines with AoA indicator installed, do you ever actually use it?
Those of you who fly Boeing machines with AoA indicator installed, do you ever actually use it?
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In Serial 25 of http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthr...=223467&page=2 , Mr Farley sums it up very well.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Of course, when someone says that they want one for use "at the edge of the flight envelope" the hairs on the back of some peoples' necks stand up; do you want one so that IF by chance you get to the edge of the envelope you can use it to more safely return to a more normal flight condition (good!) or do you want one to have increased (and possibly misplaced!) confidence in going to the edge of the envelope in the first place (not good!).
Its the "safer car design" argument - do we save lives by making a design 'safer', or do people simply adjust their conduct to the presence of the new feature, taking additional risks to end up at the same overall hazard?
Its the "safer car design" argument - do we save lives by making a design 'safer', or do people simply adjust their conduct to the presence of the new feature, taking additional risks to end up at the same overall hazard?
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: West
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are a lot of edges to the flight envelope.
I liked having the AOA indicator for turns to final and final approach. What I liked about having the AOA was that I could see errors before any other indicators would give the clue...normally before I could feel them in aircraft handling.
It's another indicator that tells me more info that's more meaningful than an ASI.
However, since we conform to the stabilized approach criteria in these big transport jets, I have learned to get along without having the AOA anymore. We're not normally anywhere near the edge of the envelope.
I liked having the AOA indicator for turns to final and final approach. What I liked about having the AOA was that I could see errors before any other indicators would give the clue...normally before I could feel them in aircraft handling.
It's another indicator that tells me more info that's more meaningful than an ASI.
However, since we conform to the stabilized approach criteria in these big transport jets, I have learned to get along without having the AOA anymore. We're not normally anywhere near the edge of the envelope.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Accident investigators use the AOA data all the time.
Unfortunately the pilot isn't trusted with the information that the investigators use to find out what happened.
The a/c have the data, it's just sent to the FDR and the pilots aren't allowed to see it.
Unfortunately the pilot isn't trusted with the information that the investigators use to find out what happened.
The a/c have the data, it's just sent to the FDR and the pilots aren't allowed to see it.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by misd-agin
Accident investigators use the AOA data all the time.
Unfortunately the pilot isn't trusted with the information that the investigators use to find out what happened.
The a/c have the data, it's just sent to the FDR and the pilots aren't allowed to see it.
Unfortunately the pilot isn't trusted with the information that the investigators use to find out what happened.
The a/c have the data, it's just sent to the FDR and the pilots aren't allowed to see it.
Hi. I fly airbus and the Flight Augmentation Computers (FACs) use AoA sensors to calculate the aircraft Gross Weight. We had a problem two days ago on a four sector flight where the gross weight the FACs came up with was tonnes different than what we had entered in the MCDU. We knew the FACs were wrong just by pax numbers and cargo (we had no cargo). Yet both FACs agreed. Because of this our characteristic speeds were all way out (up to 20kts). Apparently if the AOA senser is just .3 of a degree out it can create 3000kg difference.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
An AoA indicator on the PFD is an option on 737NGs, the 767-400 and the 777. Don't know how common it is though.
Of course using the AoA to fly at the edge of the envelope would be in upset recovery, avoidance maneuvers and the likes -- but in a 'protected' FBW aircraft wouldn't you relie on the protection in such a situation, rather than using the AoA indicator?
Also an AoA will not be garanteed accurate. On jets the AoA sensor is usually not located on the wing, but on the fuselage ahead of the wing; the measure at this loaction will not be the same as true AoA for a number of reasons.
Still, given the importance of AoA, and how many automatic systems relie upon it, of course it is peculiar that the pilot doe not get the same information. Probably has a lot to do whit habit/custom and being trained to measure AoA as a function of airspeed.
I'd take an AoA indicator any day, but I'm not sure how much I'd actually use it.
Of course using the AoA to fly at the edge of the envelope would be in upset recovery, avoidance maneuvers and the likes -- but in a 'protected' FBW aircraft wouldn't you relie on the protection in such a situation, rather than using the AoA indicator?
Also an AoA will not be garanteed accurate. On jets the AoA sensor is usually not located on the wing, but on the fuselage ahead of the wing; the measure at this loaction will not be the same as true AoA for a number of reasons.
Still, given the importance of AoA, and how many automatic systems relie upon it, of course it is peculiar that the pilot doe not get the same information. Probably has a lot to do whit habit/custom and being trained to measure AoA as a function of airspeed.
I'd take an AoA indicator any day, but I'm not sure how much I'd actually use it.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by kellykelpie
Apparently if the AOA senser is just .3 of a degree out it can create 3000kg difference.
And to achieve accuracy of more than about 0.2-0.3 degrees takes a lot of effort and probably isn't worth it for various reasons...
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Coanda F. Eckt
Also an AoA will not be garanteed accurate. On jets the AoA sensor is usually not located on the wing, but on the fuselage ahead of the wing; the measure at this loaction will not be the same as true AoA for a number of reasons.
Also the AoA that is actually useful is the one that is measured relative to the fuselage reference - that's the one used for 99.9% of the analyses used in design and certification. While the fuselage side-mounted sensor will also not be a direct reading of this parameter (which is why test aircraft routinely use noseboom sensors) its a LOT easier to calibrate/correct since the flow conditions are more dependable - and we position the sensors in the location best suited to minimise the flow effects.
They're good on a Hornet, so when you see 60*, you can back it off a bit!
Also helpful in flying max range cruise or endurance as you can just set the speed for the best AoA in each case.
AoA also for stick shaker/pushers.
Also helpful in flying max range cruise or endurance as you can just set the speed for the best AoA in each case.
AoA also for stick shaker/pushers.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by misd-agin
The a/c have the data, it's just sent to the FDR and the pilots aren't allowed to see it.
I have flown an aircraft with an AoA indicator, nice to have, but much better to translate the information to more useful presentations as alluded to above.
Regards,
Old Smokey
PPRuNe Person
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: see roster
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fly approach at x units at any weight. No tedious calculating of Vapp and is independent of any weight discrepancy.
Flare the a/c to x+y units - again removes any interpretation.
AoA too high? 'Push' the indicator down with the thrust levers.
I don't know why we don't have this on every glass equipped a/c.n
Flare the a/c to x+y units - again removes any interpretation.
AoA too high? 'Push' the indicator down with the thrust levers.
I don't know why we don't have this on every glass equipped a/c.n