Question about non-SD minimas
Thread Starter

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Belgium
Question about non-SD minimas
Hi everyones,
I starting to train myself some interesting airfield in Europe, and I have a problem with LFKJ - Campo Dell'Oro (France).
Here's the IAP, coming from the French AIP :
http://www.sia.aviation-civile.gouv....D%202.LFKJ.pdf
See the page N°5. If I want to fly the LOC 02, the missed approach point is at 4.5 nm from the treshold. So, I need of 8300 meters of visibility to spot the runway, BUT the minimum RVR for this approach is 2000 m !
My question : Why the RVR is so low ? With fog or mist, you won't be able to see the runway. Is someone already made this approach ?
Thanks in advance for any reply,
Vincent.
I starting to train myself some interesting airfield in Europe, and I have a problem with LFKJ - Campo Dell'Oro (France).
Here's the IAP, coming from the French AIP :
http://www.sia.aviation-civile.gouv....D%202.LFKJ.pdf
See the page N°5. If I want to fly the LOC 02, the missed approach point is at 4.5 nm from the treshold. So, I need of 8300 meters of visibility to spot the runway, BUT the minimum RVR for this approach is 2000 m !
My question : Why the RVR is so low ? With fog or mist, you won't be able to see the runway. Is someone already made this approach ?
Thanks in advance for any reply,
Vincent.
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: vancouver oldebloke
Remember,Like a lot of authorities around the world,one only needs a 'certain' RVR/Vis to attempt the approach.But a lot hangs on the 'legal' required Visual references encountered at DH/MDA..Ergo if one can see the terrain at the MAP one might continue 'Visually'to the field.
At the moment In Canada ,
one only needs'1200RVR' to start the approach,the onus being on the crews'Visual' assessment (regulation)at DH/MDA..If the a/c doesn't arrive on the runway one is in Violation of said Reg'....
At the moment In Canada ,
Thread Starter

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Belgium
Hi,
An answer from another forum :
1. The distance of the MAP is calculated according to the obstacle clearance required by the missed approach segments;
2. The RVR minimum for a runway is calculated, not based on the MAP distance, but based on the MDA and the airport infrastructure.
That explain the illogic difference between the RVR and the required visibility for the approach.
Bye,
Vincent.
An answer from another forum :
1. The distance of the MAP is calculated according to the obstacle clearance required by the missed approach segments;
2. The RVR minimum for a runway is calculated, not based on the MAP distance, but based on the MDA and the airport infrastructure.
That explain the illogic difference between the RVR and the required visibility for the approach.
Bye,
Vincent.

Joined: Feb 2005
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 5
From: Correr es mi destino por no llevar papel
My question : Why the RVR is so low ? With fog or mist, you won't be able to see the runway.




