Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Four Blown Tires on Cyprus

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Four Blown Tires on Cyprus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th June 2006 | 09:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: tinos greece
Four Blown Tires on Cyprus

Found this article in today's Cyprus Mail online edition. No mention of aircraft type, but that's a lotta tires to blow.


Plane in 4-tyre blow out at Paphos airport

A GERMAN LTU flight carrying 187 passengers and crew from Dusseldorf to Paphos yesterday suffered a four-tyre blow out upon landing on the runway of Paphos Airport.

The incident occurred at 6.30pm, with airport officials taking two-and-a-half hours to clear all the debris from the runway.

No injuries were reported and all passengers were safely taken off the plane.

Paphos Airport Civil Aviation Services Manager, Androula Christodoulou said the problem forced the authorities to close the airport, affecting a total of five flights scheduled for last night. Some were diverted to Larnaca Airport.

“We couldn’t fix the plane and we are waiting for spare parts from Germany,” she said, adding however that she could not speculate as to the time required to reopen the airport because of the problem’s “technical nature.”

Copyright © Cyprus Mail 2006
big fraidy cat is offline  
Old 30th June 2006 | 12:52
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: germany
LTU 321 problems in PFO

Just heard that an LTU 321 blew all four of its main during landing in PFO. Airport said to have been closed for some time, since ac couldn´t be moved.
Any daring colleagues out there with some more info on the case?

Last edited by repulo; 30th June 2006 at 13:05.
repulo is offline  
Old 30th June 2006 | 13:16
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 1997
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: 5530N
inadvertant selection of autobrake max?
Bearcat is offline  
Old 30th June 2006 | 14:32
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
From: The Deep South (Sussex)
Bearcat: What would that do apart from apply maximum braking?
Lou Scannon is offline  
Old 30th June 2006 | 15:24
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
From: UK
Originally Posted by Lou Scannon
Bearcat: What would that do apart from apply maximum braking?

Heat the tyres up so much that they blew. Just like an RTO.
AlphaWhiskyRomeo is offline  
Old 30th June 2006 | 15:43
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
From: The Deep South (Sussex)
mmm... well it's been six years since I last diced with the auto-brake system and even then I remember there were many misconceptions about it's use but I never noticed that the selector had various selections with the last one annotated (Blow all main tyres)!

Several pilots were reluctant to select "max" even when landing at maximum weight for a limiting runway. As on every landing, they knew not whether the reversers would work until they were on the ground by which time it would have been a little late to make the selection.

We are all second guessing the problem at the airfield under discussion but I doubt that the Captain would have had "max" selected and that even had he done so, at normal landing weights, it would not have been a problem.

More likely a failure in the system?
Lou Scannon is offline  
Old 30th June 2006 | 19:56
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
From: next to sidestick
Lou,

On the airbus, you NEVER, EVER use autobrake max for landing. The only time it is selected is before T/O in case of an RTO.

It doesn't seem unlikely that the use of max autobrake on landing would cause at least a few tyres to blow.
ZBMAN is offline  
Old 30th June 2006 | 21:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
that must be a personalised airbus ZBMAN,not like any i,ve flown...
sweeper is offline  
Old 1st July 2006 | 00:04
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
From: next to sidestick
I'm talking about a320 series, and I'm pretty damn sure about what I've said.
In addition if you look in the FCOM 1.32.30 p3 for msn 2105 onwards, you will find "MAX autobrake cannot be armed in flight"
It is also clearly stated in my ops manual that MAX autobrake must never be used for landing. I'm not just making this up...

Last edited by ZBMAN; 1st July 2006 at 00:17.
ZBMAN is offline  
Old 1st July 2006 | 00:28
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
From: UK
Brake 1 = Aircraft will stop in the mud.
Brake 2 = Aircraft will stop before the mud.
Brake 3 = Aircraft will stop well before the mud.
Brake 4 = Aircraft will stop in the shortest distance.
Brake 5 = Aircraft will blow some tyres and lots of paperwork to be actioned.
.
Am note sure if Brake 5 is so good, however good luck to those who hav it fitted to their Aircraft and choose to use it.
Joetom is offline  
Old 1st July 2006 | 00:43
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
From: next to sidestick
on a 320/321 there are only 3 modes LOW/MED/MAX.
ZBMAN is offline  
Old 1st July 2006 | 02:34
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 454
Likes: 3
From: Georgia, USA
The wheels are equipped with fuses that will melt if overheated, prevents tire from building so much heat they explode. There is a good chance if all four tires went flat that one tire failed, the debris on the runway and the extra heat generated by the over worked brakes caused the rest of the plugs to melt.
glhcarl is offline  
Old 1st July 2006 | 09:21
  #13 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 545
Likes: 1
From: Dunstable, Beds UK
Carl,
Yep happened on a Tristar in Palma - blew all 8

With tyres flat there is a good chance it will break the rims
Retrevial problem is that you cannot get bottle or aligator jacks under the axle as its resting on the ground ( Or very close to!)
GotTheTshirt is offline  
Old 1st July 2006 | 11:08
  #14 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 845
From: Tring, UK
I don't think the level of autobrake on its own has much to do with how hot the brakes get - it's the mass and groundspeed on touchdown which determines how much heat is generated bringing the aircraft to a full stop. Obviously, the amount of reverse used and the time it is held for will reduce the energy requirements: with higher autobrake settings, there is less time to engage and spool up reverse, plus the retarding force acts over a shorter time period.

The braking systems on airliners are certified to bring the whole show to a dead stop from V1 at max. takeoff mass with no reverse, then have at least two minutes (I think) of taxi time before the tyre plugs go. At normal landing weights and speeds you are unlikely to have a problem (as in blowing up), even with full braking and no reverse credit. It is possible, however, to blow tyres with a heavy landing or anti-skid fault...
FullWings is offline  
Old 1st July 2006 | 12:49
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
From: Europe-the sunshine side
I heard that on the Bus it's posible to select by mistake,parking brake while the aircraft is moving,is it true?
The autobrake has not,like on the 737,a position for take off (RTO) and few other settings for landing -1,2,3,max ?
alexban is offline  
Old 3rd July 2006 | 15:50
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: london
Pafos has a long enough runway for braking distance to become an issue unless:
1) Landed long
2) They were landing on 29 and tried to make the first exit (which is quite sporty without descent headwind) to avoid taxiing for another 3-4 minutes.
Keep in mind the very hot temps in June on the island in question .
gonso is offline  
Old 3rd July 2006 | 18:11
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
From: Choroni, sometimes
To my knowledge, yes it's true.

Originally Posted by alexban
I heard that on the Bus it's posible to select by mistake,parking brake while the aircraft is moving,is it true?
The autobrake has not,like on the 737,a position for take off (RTO) and few other settings for landing -1,2,3,max ?
hetfield is offline  
Old 4th July 2006 | 05:59
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: Australia
From the limited info. ie. runway closed for an hour to rmove debri...

It does not sound like a simple case of too much auto brake. Over heated brakes take time to heat up to fuse melt point 700 deg plus, at which point they deflate and the aircraft should be at a slow enough spead for them to be able to stop without damage.
Sounds more like a mechanical problem, locked brakes or anti-skid failure.
Could also result from debri on the runway, a heavy landing(blown tires) or poor x-wind/braking technique.(stomping on the brake instead of the rudder)
ShockWave is offline  
Old 4th July 2006 | 06:47
  #19 (permalink)  
Moderator
100 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 32
From: Blighty
Runway was closed for over a day, aircraft landed by the looks of things on 29, and was left disabled at just after the turnoff at the mid point. Runway was also damaged. Spares had to be flown into LCA from Germany, then transported up to Paphos.

EGGW
EGGW is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.