Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Ra-Dome Deicing

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Ra-Dome Deicing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Jun 2006, 10:08
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Springfield
Posts: 735
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ra-Dome Deicing

On the nose radar dome of Jets, what are the 6-10 lines going from the nose back. I have heard they are for de-icing.

They are very clear on the F100’s.

What are they for and how do they work???
Ejector is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2006, 10:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The radome is not made of metal, since it (usually) contains the weather radar and a metal cone would affect radar operation.

The strips are 'conductor strips' used to provide protection to the structure in the event of a lightning strike and to help dissipate static.

Nothing to do with de-icing AFAIK.
Gary Lager is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2006, 13:14
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a far better place
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also referred to as bonding straps.
captjns is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2006, 02:59
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Nirvana South
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or diverter strips
ICT_SLB is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2006, 03:18
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lockheed calls them "ARRESTORS".
glhcarl is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2006, 22:25
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 NM on final!
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thinking about static electricity... this question came to my mind:

How do aircrafts with fuselage made of composite conduct static electricity through it (e.g. Airbus)?
DC-8 is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2006, 22:46
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: US
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would think that they would still have to have some type of bonding strap system to protect the aircraft. The bonding allows the strike to enter at one spot, then continue to an exit point theortically protecting the avionionics, px., etc.
Redflyin is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2006, 23:12
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 NM on final!
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could any Airbus pilot (or other composite aircraft pilot) tell us how do their plane conduct electricity through the fuselage to the static dischargers?

And another question: If in metalic aircrafts the damage caused by a lightning strike may be a little hole of about 2mm, how severe is the damage in a composite acft?
DC-8 is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2006, 03:53
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AFAIK, the fuselage on all current generation Airbus products is metallic.
TopBunk is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2006, 08:00
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a far better place
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DC-8
Thinking about static electricity... this question came to my mind:

How do aircrafts with fuselage made of composite conduct static electricity through it (e.g. Airbus)?
If you know of any Airbus engineers, talk to them. They may even be able to break out one of their maintenance manuals to provide you with a detailed example.
captjns is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2006, 09:55
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 NM on final!
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TopBunk
AFAIK, the fuselage on all current generation Airbus products is metallic.
Yes! You're right TopBunk, I've been looking for some info about Airbus structures and I found that composite materials in the 320 are just a 10%, much less than I used to think!

However the 380 contains a 25% of composites, and the 350 will contain a 35% (wings, rear fuselage and tail cone).

But anyway, I still have the doubt of lightning strikes damage in composite structures...

For more info: http://www.airbus.com/en/aircraftfam...materials.html

Thanks!
DC-8 is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2006, 23:02
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Nirvana South
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Composite construction is present on the majority of current aircraft - it's just the percentage that is getting higher. Most aircraft have a thin copper mesh embedded under the gel coat to provide the required lightning and electrostatic protection. Bonding straps or metal to metal connections to main structure provide the necessary continuity to ground for the panel. Static wicks are normally attached to some metallic structure as they require low bonding resistance.

All-composite aircraft such as the Starship have particular problems as they require all power returns to be brought back to grounding plates near the power supplies as there is no convenient metal structure. It will be interesting to see how Boeing gets over this on the 787 especially with the "all-electric aircraft" requirement for very large amounts of power.
ICT_SLB is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2006, 10:34
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 NM on final!
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ICT_SLB
Most aircraft have a thin copper mesh embedded under the gel coat to provide the required lightning and electrostatic protection.
So that's the trick... Thanks for your reply!
DC-8 is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2006, 10:47
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
some aircraft with high amounts of carbon fibre or other composites have a strip embedded in the gelcoat, which is in turn earthed to the nearest metallic part of the airframe, and usually ends in a static wick.

and yes, the strips on the radome are 'diverter' strips, diverting electrical energy to the metgallic airframe. any lightening strike into the radar head could end up with the radar screen blowing in the cockpit (along with everything else!) - not a good look.
nzmarty is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2006, 10:48
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
apologies for the double post.....
nzmarty is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2006, 10:43
  #16 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Springfield
Posts: 735
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks folks for the info.
So, I presume that the nose, (leading edge of the plane) doesn't have an ice problem then? Is that because it's so 'blunt'?

EJ
Ejector is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2006, 12:09
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ejector
Thanks folks for the info.
So, I presume that the nose, (leading edge of the plane) doesn't have an ice problem then? Is that because it's so 'blunt'?
EJ
You'll get some quite impressive ice shapes on the nose if you wait long enough in icing, but the effect of ice on the nose (compared to, say, wing or tail) is relatively minor.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.