Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

B737 LEADING EDGE TRANSIT LIGHT

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

B737 LEADING EDGE TRANSIT LIGHT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd May 2006, 13:07
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: in my dreams
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, but subsequent checks to ensure it is in the correct position are done only after the initial relevant maintenance procedure has been carried out when first discovered. If a light comes on during taxi, then the maintenance procedure cannot have been carried out as the bulbs would have been removed. At that stage, you have no idea whether or not there is a bigger hidden problem and that the flap is indeed u/s. It is not acceptable for the light to come on and just go anyway because it looks right from the cabin, without first having had it checked by the engineers to ensure that the leading edge device does indeed work correctly. You are then operating under an ADD for which a visual check is required before each take off and landing.

Picking and choosing individual bits from the DDPG to suit doesn't work. It can only be taken in context of the whole procedure.

P.S. It's metabolix, not metalibox. It helps if you read things properly Saves a lot of confusion when reading DDPGs and QRHs

Last edited by metabolix; 23rd May 2006 at 13:28.
metabolix is offline  
Old 23rd May 2006, 14:35
  #22 (permalink)  
LEM
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Right, sorry!!!!!!!!!!!!

It shows I'm on sick leave today!!!!!
LEM is offline  
Old 23rd May 2006, 15:24
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: in my dreams
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No need to apologise my friend. I just hope I have been able to clear things up in your mind a bit better. As I-2021, I thank you for getting my head back in the books.

Believe me, there are plenty of things that Boeing do that I question e.g. how come the QRH checklist for an APU fire is no longer a recall item? But that can wait for another day

metabolix
metabolix is offline  
Old 23rd May 2006, 20:29
  #24 (permalink)  
LEM
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Easy answer: money.

Airbus has got almost no recall items, so...
Like that, even the Pigmees in the Zaire can operate both A and B...

Thanks God, we're still operating with the old procedures, and knowing the mentality here, I doubt very much they'll make the effort to change everything, now that we're going to start receiving all our new busses...

LEM is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.