Fuel burn of JT8D-9 powered 732
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NZWN New Zealand
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fuel burn of JT8D-9 powered 732
I have been hunting high and low for charts online about fuel burn for the Boeing 737-200-9. I can't find anything.
Sure Boeing.com has range performance charts and yes Chris Brady's 737.org has stuff about the -7 powered and -17 powered 732, but nothing in between.
The -17 powered 732 had an econ cruise of 4,440kg/hr and the -7 powered aircraft had an econ cruise burn of 3,200kg/hr, but please can someone put me out of my misery over the -9 (or 9A) version.
Incidentally what is the difference -9 v -9A ?
Is there a rule of thumb also about fuel burned climbing to altitude ?
Please go easy with me. I'm just a PPL (I snuck in the back door)
Sure Boeing.com has range performance charts and yes Chris Brady's 737.org has stuff about the -7 powered and -17 powered 732, but nothing in between.
The -17 powered 732 had an econ cruise of 4,440kg/hr and the -7 powered aircraft had an econ cruise burn of 3,200kg/hr, but please can someone put me out of my misery over the -9 (or 9A) version.
Incidentally what is the difference -9 v -9A ?
Is there a rule of thumb also about fuel burned climbing to altitude ?
Please go easy with me. I'm just a PPL (I snuck in the back door)
The Aquatone Article
Join Date: May 2004
Location: London
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Kiwiguy,
No one is ever "just" a PPL - not in my book anyway. It still puts you ahead (or above) 99.8% of the world's population.
On the subject of burns, there is nothing "econ" about your quoted burn of 4,440kgs per hour for a -17 powered B737. That's almost into B767 territory, and well above B757. I'd guess the right figure for a -17 is around 2,550 kgs/hour for 3 hour sectors (quite long, admittedly), and I'd expect -9 to be close to that.
As for -9 vs -9A, the later "A"s (-15A and -17A) had minor gas path improvements and therefore slightly better SFC, as I recall.
No one is ever "just" a PPL - not in my book anyway. It still puts you ahead (or above) 99.8% of the world's population.
On the subject of burns, there is nothing "econ" about your quoted burn of 4,440kgs per hour for a -17 powered B737. That's almost into B767 territory, and well above B757. I'd guess the right figure for a -17 is around 2,550 kgs/hour for 3 hour sectors (quite long, admittedly), and I'd expect -9 to be close to that.
As for -9 vs -9A, the later "A"s (-15A and -17A) had minor gas path improvements and therefore slightly better SFC, as I recall.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Age: 50
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi, looked through my old notes, I have some take-off and landing data for the -9 but nothing for the cruise unfortunately. For -15 I have take-off/cruise/landing data.
We used to use the following average fuel burns for -15...
JNB-NLA flight time 01:57 fuel 5900kg
JNB-TNR 02:44 8200kg
JNB-BZV 03:43 10,600kg
BZV-COO 02:31 7,200kg
COO-OUA 01:10 3,600kg
and as rule-of-thumb...
First half hour - 2020
First hour - 3300
First hour and half - 4400
First two hours - 5800
First two and half hrs - 7100
Hope this helps....
JD
We used to use the following average fuel burns for -15...
JNB-NLA flight time 01:57 fuel 5900kg
JNB-TNR 02:44 8200kg
JNB-BZV 03:43 10,600kg
BZV-COO 02:31 7,200kg
COO-OUA 01:10 3,600kg
and as rule-of-thumb...
First half hour - 2020
First hour - 3300
First hour and half - 4400
First two hours - 5800
First two and half hrs - 7100
Hope this helps....
JD
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NZWN New Zealand
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank you guys...
4,440kg per hour came from a performance table in an October 1975 edition of Flight International magazine. Gee sure glad the mag was wrong.
Chris Brady's 737 website suggests a big difference between the -7 powered 732 and the -17. I am still curious what margin there is between the -9 and -17 aircraft.
A friend at the Aviation Forum where I hang out sent me a table of engine performances for the JT8D variants which suggests the -9 is more fuel thirsty on take off than the -7 but roughly similar in cruise consumption.
Thanks Jelly Doughnut. Now all I need to do is find out all those airport abbreviations hahaha
Most appreciated...
4,440kg per hour came from a performance table in an October 1975 edition of Flight International magazine. Gee sure glad the mag was wrong.
Chris Brady's 737 website suggests a big difference between the -7 powered 732 and the -17. I am still curious what margin there is between the -9 and -17 aircraft.
A friend at the Aviation Forum where I hang out sent me a table of engine performances for the JT8D variants which suggests the -9 is more fuel thirsty on take off than the -7 but roughly similar in cruise consumption.
Thanks Jelly Doughnut. Now all I need to do is find out all those airport abbreviations hahaha
Most appreciated...
Prof. Airport Engineer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Australia (mostly)
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This page gives detailed data for the 732 fuel burn, but nothing on the specific engine type. It should help resolve the flight into cruise, climb and descent segments so you can make sense of the other quoted figures: http://www.geocities.com/profemery/a...7_200_fuel.pdf
