Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Turbofan Flat Rating

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Turbofan Flat Rating

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th May 2006, 15:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turbofan Flat Rating

EGT is proportional to the Turbine Inlet Temperature and the TIT indicates how much energy there is to turn the Turbines and hence rotate the Compressors.

Operate the turbofan engine at a particular EGT at ISA conditions now and we get 50,000 lbs Thrust.

Years down the road, we operate it at the SAME EGT and ISA, we still get 50,000 lbs Thrust ?
Hachiouji-shi is offline  
Old 14th May 2006, 15:38
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probably not; most engines deteriorate with age, so even though you're using the same energy and getting the same EGT you probably wont get the same thrust (you may also be using more fuel to get to the same EGT, if the combustor efficiency has degraded)
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 14th May 2006, 16:28
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So if we use extra fuel to get the same EGT at ISA, theoretically we still get same thrust as 10 years ago?
Hachiouji-shi is offline  
Old 14th May 2006, 17:05
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I doubt it; even for the same energy input to the turbines, I doubt they'll extract energy as efficiently as when new (gaps and seals have probably degraded, causing the turbine (and compressor) to lose efficiency.

IIRC, the Speys of UK Phantoms - which were very old by the end of their life - had fuel flow AND thrust penalties large enough to be accounted for in aircraft operations.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 14th May 2006, 22:20
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Typically, as a jet engine ages, we experience increasing EGT to deliver the same thrust as in 'new' condition. All of which probably explains why we refer to EPR or N1, not EGT, when setting a 'target' thrust.

Regards,

Old Smokey

Last edited by Old Smokey; 15th May 2006 at 00:54.
Old Smokey is offline  
Old 15th May 2006, 13:07
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looking at a high-bypass engine:

As the LPT seals and airfoils deteriorate, N1 will decease over time when running at constant LPT inlet temperature (that's called EGT on many engine models, even though it's not the exhaust temperature). The N1 decrease means that the fan pumps less airflow, so fan thrust is DOWN a bit.

Conversely, the LPT is extracting less energy from the core stream, so the LPT exhaust out the core nozzle is a bit hotter; ergo core thrust is UP a bit.

So it's a tug-of-war; Which will win - core thrust or fan thust? My bet for most engines the total thrust will be down, but not much.

(NOTE where I have specified the EGT measurement point; it's sometimes called ITT or Inter-Turbine Temp. Not all engines are the same!)
barit1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.