Tankering Fuel - Yes or No?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tankering Fuel - Yes or No?
We are often asked to tanker fuel between LGW and Scotland and sometimes even as far as Italy. It makes me uneasy to carry extra fuel, which burns extra fuel, increasing our overall fuel consumption to save a few dollars.
In these days of sensitivity to carbon emissions, threats of global warming, and even if you are a 'global warming denier', the finite nature of oil reserves, I believe we should be doing our utmost to save every drop we can.
Does anyone else believe it to be immoral and unwise to tanker fuel? Should the use of these resources overide any economic considerations? Should fuel-tankering be regulated?
(Please note, I am not talking about bringing fuel into LHR and other places where local supplies are themselves limited - that is a practical consideration.)
In these days of sensitivity to carbon emissions, threats of global warming, and even if you are a 'global warming denier', the finite nature of oil reserves, I believe we should be doing our utmost to save every drop we can.
Does anyone else believe it to be immoral and unwise to tanker fuel? Should the use of these resources overide any economic considerations? Should fuel-tankering be regulated?
(Please note, I am not talking about bringing fuel into LHR and other places where local supplies are themselves limited - that is a practical consideration.)
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Camp X-Ray
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When you drive an electric car, live in a house powered by renewable resources and recycle everything then you might want to consider cutting down on tankering to save the planet. Whilst your sentiment is admirable you really need to keep a sense of perspective. The extra gas you burn tankering on every sector this year is likely to be considerably less than the gas I burned on the last sector I did. The excess burn from tankering really is a tiny drop in the ocean!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cloud 9
Posts: 2,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tankering fuel saves more than a few dollars and multiplied by several or more times a day and all the year round will save one hell of a lot of dollars and could make the difference between remaining employed or becoming unemployed.
Whilst I am one for concerns regarding the environment, my house is full of low energy light bulbs etc, I would like to remain employed to continue paying the mortgage etc.
Whilst I am one for concerns regarding the environment, my house is full of low energy light bulbs etc, I would like to remain employed to continue paying the mortgage etc.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BlueDog makes a valid point in an altruistic sense. But the real question is - why is tankering necessary? Is it a genuine shortage in Scotland (so near to the North Sea), or is it supply monopoly artificially raising the local price?
Airlines are the "fuel suppliers of last resort" when conventional market sources come up short. It's unfair to point the finger of blame at an airline when more efficient surface transport is failing to do the job.
Airlines are the "fuel suppliers of last resort" when conventional market sources come up short. It's unfair to point the finger of blame at an airline when more efficient surface transport is failing to do the job.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dog,
i am very suprised your tankering from lgw to gla! never seen that before.
don't think i ever tank'd without a good reason. i take it you work for BA. in fact every time i tank'd when on SH it made sense and was more often to do with fuel quality issues at the dest.
if your so worried about the inviroment you should probably quit flying
ps if we built more new nuclear plants then maybe we could save on finite resources and have a cleaner world. the greens are going to destroy the planet!
i am very suprised your tankering from lgw to gla! never seen that before.
don't think i ever tank'd without a good reason. i take it you work for BA. in fact every time i tank'd when on SH it made sense and was more often to do with fuel quality issues at the dest.
if your so worried about the inviroment you should probably quit flying
ps if we built more new nuclear plants then maybe we could save on finite resources and have a cleaner world. the greens are going to destroy the planet!
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sydney NSW Australia
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Burn it all!! NOW the soon its gone the sooner we will be FORCED into developing new technolgies! and the soon the planet can start to recover.... till then ill keep my V8 and Rotary cars of the early 80's 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: uae
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlueDog
Does anyone else believe it to be immoral and unwise to tanker fuel? Should the use of these resources overide any economic considerations? Should fuel-tankering be regulated?
You reinforce my decision to get out of this stupid business............ever felt the outflow valve tension release when when you get the ZFW and its less than planned,tankering is policy on route, and youre heading back towards "Mitch"?????????
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a far better place
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think carrying a little extra fuel is good common sense for unforseen events that can occur.. ala last Monday evening in EGSS.
The only time you have too much gas on an airplane is when you are on fire.
The only time you have too much gas on an airplane is when you are on fire.
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: My views - Not my employer!
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry, I wouldn't bother with this for starters. For me, it would be round trip catering, water tanks always being full (ever returned from a long flight with less than 1/2 water?) crew bags ramining onboard regardless. Want me to harp on any more?
OOOOhhh, and the weight of the tech log could come down too...
OOOOhhh, and the weight of the tech log could come down too...
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In our company we periodically get a list of sectors on which Tankering is recommended. It lists the total cost savings per kilo-litre of fuel.
This includes not just the price difference between fuel at departure and destination, but also factors in the approximate expenditure (extra fuel burned) incured in carrying the extra tankered fuel.
The net figure is provided in the list, and it is plain to see the immense cost savings involved in tankering on certain sectors.
The extra fuel burned to tanker the extra fuel is minimal as compared to the savings from the difference in cost of fuel at an expensive destination.
This includes not just the price difference between fuel at departure and destination, but also factors in the approximate expenditure (extra fuel burned) incured in carrying the extra tankered fuel.
The net figure is provided in the list, and it is plain to see the immense cost savings involved in tankering on certain sectors.
The extra fuel burned to tanker the extra fuel is minimal as compared to the savings from the difference in cost of fuel at an expensive destination.
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BlueDog
Tanking fuel-what a waste, turning fuel into money to keep the accountants happy. Is it a good return ?
In the future when fuel supplies dry up people will look back in amazement at how we burnt fuel transporting fuel.
You are right we should be saving fuel.
Tanking fuel-what a waste, turning fuel into money to keep the accountants happy. Is it a good return ?
In the future when fuel supplies dry up people will look back in amazement at how we burnt fuel transporting fuel.
You are right we should be saving fuel.
ECON cruise, LR cruise...
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: MIRSI hold - give or take...
Age: 52
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you care about your companys commercial success - you tanker fuel. If you don't give a damn about it, go plog minimum. The difference in terms of emissions, well - you could choose to be a good guy & fly ECON climb/cruise/descent at all times, looking carefully for wind/altitude trades at all times and drive a SmartForTwo (unless you already do all of these).
It's a shame if one company tries to hold a slightly greener profile and ends up going under due to extra fuel expenses. It's a lot of money if you fly between destinations with index 89 and 164 - even on a 73 landing with 7 ton vs. 2 ton equates to almost 1700 USD saved.
Just me tupppence worth
Empty
It's a shame if one company tries to hold a slightly greener profile and ends up going under due to extra fuel expenses. It's a lot of money if you fly between destinations with index 89 and 164 - even on a 73 landing with 7 ton vs. 2 ton equates to almost 1700 USD saved.
Just me tupppence worth
Empty
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: in the western part of the United State of Europe
Age: 47
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh, and then we don't even talk about ferry flights. Evildoers.
BTW, what costindex do you guys fly most of the time?
We have apolicy of 16 for the 737-500 and 12 for the -700.
Econ climb, cruise and descent. Cost savings over index 30 appeared to be €15 per 1500 NM. Those savings tok also into account the added mainenance cost of longer flighttimes. Go figure.
BTW, what costindex do you guys fly most of the time?
We have apolicy of 16 for the 737-500 and 12 for the -700.
Econ climb, cruise and descent. Cost savings over index 30 appeared to be €15 per 1500 NM. Those savings tok also into account the added mainenance cost of longer flighttimes. Go figure.
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Of course the accountants love it....
On a single route into LHR, 10 flights per week, we can save over $100,000 per month by tankering fuel. That includes the additional cost of carriage/ wear and tear!
Mutt
On a single route into LHR, 10 flights per week, we can save over $100,000 per month by tankering fuel. That includes the additional cost of carriage/ wear and tear!
Mutt
Sims Fly Virtually
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Used to be 3rd Sand Dune from the Left - But now I'm somewhere else somewhere else.
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mutt,
I think that SV may be an "extreme case" here, with the economics of the fuel supply "at home" and the situation,say, at LHR.
However, I suppose you could say that the UK government bring it on themselves, and us, by taxing fuel (road, air) so highly.
I wonder if BA used to and BMI now do, tanker out of RUH, JED? Certainly would make "commercial sense"!
I think that SV may be an "extreme case" here, with the economics of the fuel supply "at home" and the situation,say, at LHR.
However, I suppose you could say that the UK government bring it on themselves, and us, by taxing fuel (road, air) so highly.
I wonder if BA used to and BMI now do, tanker out of RUH, JED? Certainly would make "commercial sense"!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stockholm Sweden
Age: 74
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Our flight plan system used to add tankering fuel for flights into ARN. The saving was guoted at 8 UKL/ton. (Yes eight)
And people took it. Then we needed deicing because of the tankered fuel which costs aroun 600 UKL a go. So we didnt save a lot overall. I finally wrote a long treatise about it to ops planning, and they stopped doing it.
And people took it. Then we needed deicing because of the tankered fuel which costs aroun 600 UKL a go. So we didnt save a lot overall. I finally wrote a long treatise about it to ops planning, and they stopped doing it.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stockholm Sweden
Age: 74
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[However, I suppose you could say that the UK government bring it on themselves, and us, by taxing fuel (road, air) so highly.
Aviation fuel is not taxed (yet).
and neither is engine oil either. When I buy engine oil from Mobil I pay no VAT on the bill!
Aviation fuel is not taxed (yet).
and neither is engine oil either. When I buy engine oil from Mobil I pay no VAT on the bill!
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ashbourne Co Meath Ireland
Age: 73
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, I know, thread drift
In the future when fuel supplies dry up people will look back in amazement at how we burnt fuel transporting fuel.
