Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Airbus deck angles

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Airbus deck angles

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Apr 2006, 21:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,789
Received 45 Likes on 21 Posts
Airbus deck angles

Can anyone explain why Airbus's, particularly the larger ones, approach at such a high deck angle compared to Boeings? Do they have higher incident angles, or do they approach at higher angles of attack?
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2006, 00:14
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wing Design

The Airbus wing design is such that the aircraft actually flies to the ground. This improves landing and go-around stability and performance. The landing escape manouvre is enhanced.
Escape_Slide is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2006, 04:59
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,789
Received 45 Likes on 21 Posts
The Airbus wing design is such that the aircraft actually flies to the ground.
Errr....right..... So in the 737 I..errr... swim to the ground?
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2006, 05:54
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: what U.S. calls Žold EuropeŽ
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airbus and Boeing wing design is quite different if it comes to high lift configuration. While Boeing is using tripple slotted flaps (with the upper surface of the third flap almost perpendicular to the fuselage longitudinal axis at max deflection), Airbus uses just single slotted fowler flaps at smaller deflection angle, but with very high efficiency.
So if you understand extending the flaps as virtually turning the wing relative to the fuselage (turning the zero lift angle of incidence), Boeings "turn" their wings more than Airbus, thus needing lower fuselage AoA.
Volume is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2006, 16:52
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,789
Received 45 Likes on 21 Posts
That makes sense.

Single slotted flaps would obviously be mechanically much simpler (and, indeed, Boeing went from triple to double slots on the 737-NG and (I think!!) the 777) but I wonder which is more effective?

As the main purpose of flaps is to increase CLmax,which configuration would give the greater gain over CLmax (clean)?
Wizofoz is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.