Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

"Descend to and Maintain FLXXX"

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

"Descend to and Maintain FLXXX"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Apr 2006, 13:44
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: FL 410
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Descend to and Maintain FLXXX"

Trying to find specific guidance from the AIM or the FARs regarding descent rates when given the above ATC instruction (In the US anyway). Both sources cited refer to optimum rates of descent (which I have always understood to be atleast 1500 fpm for us jet types). Some FOs I have flown with reach for the Alt Intv button, giving only 1000 fpm, an insufficient ROD I believe.

Anyone?
jonny dangerous is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2006, 16:28
  #2 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It always used to mean, and as far as I know still does, that one descends at maximum rate. That does not mean always extend speedbrakes, but use idle power until within the last 1000' where a maximum of 500fpm should (perhaps 'may'?) be used. None of the smooth European-type continuous descent operations. It is in the US ATC part of the Aerad Flight Guide I seem to remember.
Rainboe is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2006, 11:39
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The US AIM says:

Descend or climb at an optimum rate consistent with the operating characteristics of the aircraft to 1,000 feet above or below the assigned altitude, and then attempt to descend or climb at a rate of between 500 and 1,500 fpm until the assigned altitude is reached.

I think optimum rate is in the eye of the beholder - it's certainly doesn't have to be an idle descent, nor does it have to be 1500fpm.
Personally - if it's a change of a couple of thousand feet I'd use 1,000fpm, that seems optimum to me for such a small change. Once you start the "long descent" then chances are there's a crossing restriction in your future, even if it's only the 10,000 feet at 30 miles rule of thumb, and at that point the optimum ROD is whatever keeps me on the crossing restriction profile.
Below 10,000 or so I use 1500fpm because that's what our training said to use
mwaugh is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2006, 11:58
  #4 (permalink)  
742
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jonny dangerous
...giving only 1000 fpm, an insufficient ROD I believe.

Anyone?
I agree with you. Slow descent rates often result in penalty vectors, and many pilots don't seem to make the connection.
742 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.