Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

WGS84 Standard


Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

WGS84 Standard

Old 27th October 2005 | 08:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Question WGS84 Standard

Would anybody know of a URL that contains information as to whether a country is compliant with WGS84 standard? I am thinking strictly in terms of aviation applications here.

TIA for any information provided.
Pengintai is offline  
Old 27th October 2005 | 17:34
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: In transit
Try http://www.jeppesen.com/wlcs/index.j..._wgs84.html%20 as at Feb 2005.

Lefty
LeftBreak is offline  
Old 28th October 2005 | 02:18
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,777
Likes: 9
From: Blighty
The whole world has been mapped to WGS84 standard. It was done to facilitate GPS. As the US military use it to guide their bombs and as no-one knows who GWB is going to declare as an 'axis of evil' as part of his 'war on terror', I suppose they thought they'd better include everyone!

BTW, have a look at Google Earth - it's brilliant!
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 31st October 2005 | 03:59
  #4 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,125
Likes: 7
From: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Exclamation

WGS84 Compliance? As someone posted here not too long ago, when his GPS was reporting him at the geographic coordinates for Southend airport he found he was a not inconsiderable distance away at Southend Pier. (The pier was still intact at the time) The maps were not WGS84 compliant. That's one reason why caution is necessary when using GPS.
Blacksheep is offline  
Old 31st October 2005 | 18:29
  #5 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 90
... well, to be fair, it wasn't actually a GPS problem...
reynoldsno1 is offline  
Old 31st October 2005 | 23:32
  #6 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,125
Likes: 7
From: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Perhaps not, but he was still "temporarily unsure of his position"!
Blacksheep is offline  
Old 1st November 2005 | 01:56
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 100
Likes: 1
From: Oakland CA USA
"when his GPS was reporting him at the geographic coordinates for Southend airport he found he was a not inconsiderable distance away at Southend Pier. (The pier was still intact at the time) The maps were not WGS84 compliant."

The discrepancy was what-- miles? If so, that's much too large to be explained by the shift from the old mapping datum to WGS84.
Tim Zukas is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.