Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

744 - Slat retraction on touch down


Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

744 - Slat retraction on touch down

Old 17th October 2005 | 07:37
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: ^Up there^
744 - Slat retraction on touch down

Noticed when paxing home the other day that the slats on the 747 retract just after touch-down. Would someone care to explain how and why this works?

Cheers,
RS
romansandal is offline  
Old 17th October 2005 | 08:17
  #2 (permalink)  
jtr
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: .
Does it on reverse selection.

Avoids FOD from engine. They re-extend when you cancel reverse.
jtr is offline  
Old 17th October 2005 | 08:50
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: Manchester
Saw this question on another forum so, having never heard about it, consulted the Maintenance manual.
The outer sets of leading edge devices are retracted automaticaly on selection of reverse thrust to reduce fatigue on the outer LE pannels.

Rgds Dr I.
Dr Illitout is offline  
Old 17th October 2005 | 14:09
  #4 (permalink)  
jtr
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: .
Pretty sure you will find it is the inboards and midspans, the outboards stay as is.
jtr is offline  
Old 17th October 2005 | 14:11
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Oakland, CA
I do not know if this is an "option" on the 744. On the Classic it seems to have been as some will and some won't.
FearlessFreep is offline  
Old 17th October 2005 | 15:52
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 3
From: Arizona USA
A Boeing idea, from long ago.

Same on the 707. When reverse selected, the LED's retracted pneumatically, then re-extended again when reverse cancelled.
This was to avoid slush contamination behind the LED's when landing on contaminated runways.

Worked good...
411A is offline  
Old 17th October 2005 | 16:14
  #7 (permalink)  

Usual disclaimers apply!
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
From: EGGW
Cool

On the Classic it seems to have been as some will and some won't.
The later -200 a/c and on had this feature.

edit to add it was available on earlier a/c as an SB

Last edited by gas path; 17th October 2005 at 16:46.
gas path is offline  
Old 17th October 2005 | 18:54
  #8 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 17
From: Delta of Venus
Just to be a bit pedantic i know, but there are no slats on any 747, just kruegers inboard and LE variable camber flaps outboard.
Private jet is offline  
Old 18th October 2005 | 18:09
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: Manchester
Sorry gang got it wrong, jtr is right.

http://www.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!/open.file/770568/L/

but it is to reduce the fatigue on the LE divices.
I will now go and read the entire 747-400 mm from cover to cover as punishment!


Rgds Dr I
Dr Illitout is offline  
Old 18th October 2005 | 18:34
  #10 (permalink)  
PersonalTitle to help support PPRuNe against legal bullying.
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: France
Leaner Question Please?

Private Jet,

Please could you explain for the benefit of all the non experts, what is the difference between "kruegers", "variable camber flaps", and "slats".

From your comment I understand that these are all variations in the movable LE parts of the wing, which protrude out in front in order to increase the circulation and/or to reduce the stall speed of the wing, but there must be a specific reason why they all have a different name?

Thanks,
Tallsandwich.
tallsandwich is offline  
Old 19th October 2005 | 01:17
  #11 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,777
Likes: 9
From: Blighty
Krugers (should be an umlout over the U but can't do it on my keyboard in pprune) are the simplest form of LE device. They are simply a panel which folds out forward. The variable camber devicesa are flexbible composite panels which lie flat whe stowed, but flex into a curved shape to cmplement the natural shape odf the aerofoil when deployed.

Slats aren't fitted to 747s. Technically, a slat is part of the aerofoil which moved forward of the wing to extend the leading edge forward and downward. Airbusses use slats, they tend to be more difficult and expensive to construct. They can also have slots which allow some of the higher pressure air on the undersurface to leak to the upper surface which re-energises the upper surface boundary layer thus delaying the onset of separation and delaying the stall.
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 19th October 2005 | 19:59
  #12 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 17
From: Delta of Venus
Hi TS,

Dan got there before me, his reply explains the differences as good as anyone. Hope its enlightening.
Private jet is offline  
Old 19th October 2005 | 20:54
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: UK
QUOTE

They re-extend when you cancel reverse.

UNQUOTE

Why do they need to extend again? Surely they get tucked away again on the way back to the gate?
+'ve ROC is offline  
Old 19th October 2005 | 22:05
  #14 (permalink)  
40 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 2,647
Likes: 307
From: In front of a computer
Because the contoller uses simple logic. The LE is deployed by selecting Flaps away from "up" thus when reverse is selected the "retract" command simply interrupts the deployment. As soon as reverse is cancelled they redeploy to the commanded position. Then they can be retracted as part of the after landing procedure.............
ETOPS is offline  
Old 19th October 2005 | 22:23
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere hot, hot, hot
Thus adding redundancy against the reverser retraction system malfunctioning and not extending the LE devices properly when you really do need them...

Redundancy achieved through making a system intentionally simple, in other words.
Maxrev is offline  
Old 20th October 2005 | 06:57
  #16 (permalink)  
PersonalTitle to help support PPRuNe against legal bullying.
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: France
I am now educated...

Thanks for the details guys.
tallsandwich is offline  
Old 20th October 2005 | 07:42
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 467
Likes: 12
From: Vic
Does anyone have any knowedge about their respective cost, complexity as well as a maintenance standpoint. Is one cheaper than the other to make, maintain etc?
Ozgrade3 is offline  
Old 20th October 2005 | 10:10
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: Stockholm Sweden
The B747 krugers extend again on deselection of reverse thrust to cater for a go around.
Swedish Steve is offline  
Old 23rd October 2005 | 14:06
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: UK
at the risk of being a pedant - doesn't the MLG have to contact the ground before the reversers are engaged?

can you still GA once your feet are on the ground?

out if idle curiosity.
ROC
+'ve ROC is offline  
Old 23rd October 2005 | 15:32
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: USA
Yes, there is offcourse in the 747 a reverse interlock which will be removed upon touchdown so that the reverse levers can be moved to the "unstow position" and after they have reached 90 percent of their travel to the extended position the second interlock will be removed so that you can increase rpm off the engines using the reverse levers.

Offcourse in my boing manual it states that after selection of reverse thrust it is not recommended to make a go around due to possibility of not fully retracting reverser shells.

It does not say anything about a go-around once the wheels are on the ground, it will basically be the same as a touch and go in that case
Hawker-rider is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.