Spacing of runway lights
Thread Starter
Spacing of runway lights
Someone asked me this question the other day and i have to admit I had no idea what the answer is!
Is edge lighting spacing dependant on runway width (in order to maintain correct visual "perspective" on approach)? if so what is the formula for calculating this.. If not, what is the spacing exactly? Is it variable? I'm usually too busy (T.O/landing) to notice or try and work it out!! Can't seem to find it in any reference either. Any input appreciated.
Is edge lighting spacing dependant on runway width (in order to maintain correct visual "perspective" on approach)? if so what is the formula for calculating this.. If not, what is the spacing exactly? Is it variable? I'm usually too busy (T.O/landing) to notice or try and work it out!! Can't seem to find it in any reference either. Any input appreciated.
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Euroland
Posts: 2,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The light spacing will be published in the AIP.
Most instrument runways have 60m spacing or less. Visual runways can have up to 100m spacing.
The spacing only becomes dependant on width when one is dealing with a runway which could be more than 60m wide. Then the nature of operations, light distribution of the edge lights and other bisual aids serving the runway are taken into account.
Regards,
DFC
Most instrument runways have 60m spacing or less. Visual runways can have up to 100m spacing.
The spacing only becomes dependant on width when one is dealing with a runway which could be more than 60m wide. Then the nature of operations, light distribution of the edge lights and other bisual aids serving the runway are taken into account.
Regards,
DFC
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is edge lighting spacing dependant on runway width (in order to maintain correct visual "perspective" on approach)? if so what is the formula for calculating this.. If not, what is the spacing exactly? Is it variable? I'm usually too busy (T.O/landing) to notice or try and work it out!! Can't seem to find it in any reference either. Any input appreciated.
The runway edge lights are located on a line parallel to the runway centerline at least 2 ft (0.6 m), but not more than 10 ft (3 m), from the edge of the full strength pavement designated for runway use. On runways used by jet aircraft, we recommend 10 ft (3 m) to avoid possible damage by jet blasts. On runways not used by jet aircraft, we recommend 2 ft (0.6 m). The edge lights are uniformly spaced symmetrically about the runway centerline, such that a line between light units on opposite sides of the runway is perpendicular to the runway centerline. Longitudinal spacing between light units must not exceed 200 ft (61 m). Use threshold/runway end lights as the starting reference points for longitudinal spacing calculations during design.
Hope this helps.
________
AirRabbit
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Birchington, Kent, England
Age: 82
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Private jet
I note you are from the UK. Have a look at the CAA website and you will find CAP 168: Licensing of Aerodromes. Chapter 5 Para 5 gives some indication for UK aerodromes but other countries may vary.
CAP 168 is probably based on an ICAO specification but I have no definite knowledge of that.
I note you are from the UK. Have a look at the CAA website and you will find CAP 168: Licensing of Aerodromes. Chapter 5 Para 5 gives some indication for UK aerodromes but other countries may vary.
CAP 168 is probably based on an ICAO specification but I have no definite knowledge of that.
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
CAP 168 is probably based on an ICAO specification but I have no definite knowledge of that.
CAP 168 follows Annex 14, except where the UK CAA has filed a 'difference'. Usually, the UK CAA attempts to follow ICAO pretty closely.
Actually, it's all a bit circular, 'cos Annex 14 is largely based on earlier work done by the UK Ministry of Aviation, which preceded the CAA.
We provide lighting in accordance with CAP 168. However, many airlines operate to JAR Ops which allows them to operate when certain parts of our kit aren't working. This can vary from company to company. Thus, if there are variations at an individual aerodrome, some operators will be able to land and take-off, others not.
Cheers,
The Odd One
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sky
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Private jet,
DFC has covered it nicely. In addition to this, runway edge lights at runway intersections may be spaced irregularly or omitted, provided that adequate guidance remains available to the pilot.
VC10 Rib22
DFC has covered it nicely. In addition to this, runway edge lights at runway intersections may be spaced irregularly or omitted, provided that adequate guidance remains available to the pilot.
VC10 Rib22
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Earth, where else?
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Guys,
When I was young and b.....,
people thaught me that the only distance that never changes are the TDZ (touchdown zone lights), it seems to be always (worldwide) 30m.
The CL and Runway edge lights seem to differ quite a lot....
Any comments on the above ?
Regards
When I was young and b.....,
people thaught me that the only distance that never changes are the TDZ (touchdown zone lights), it seems to be always (worldwide) 30m.
The CL and Runway edge lights seem to differ quite a lot....
Any comments on the above ?
Regards
