Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Jar 25 Torr

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th September 2005 | 07:57
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 1,846
Likes: 4
From: Bristol, England
Jar 25 Torr

Anyone know when wet runway TORR in JAR 25.113 changed from the distance to unstick to the distance to 15ft? I missed the change when it happened.
Alex Whittingham is online now  
Old 15th September 2005 | 15:57
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: Worldwide
Alex,

Think it been there since the beginning for wet runways, thinking back 15+ years.

Zeke is offline  
Old 15th September 2005 | 16:27
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 1,846
Likes: 4
From: Bristol, England
Oh dear. Peter Swatton's book has it wrong too, as does the CAA CAP for the exams. Red faces all round . Are you sure it hasn't changed? We're talking about Take-Off Run here, not Take-Off Distance.
Alex Whittingham is online now  
Old 15th September 2005 | 20:05
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: vancouver oldebloke
I believe that since the EASA have taken over, to keep all the JAA's under one roof recently?,the 15' feet(wet) is now at the end of the' runway'surface.....At one time it was at the end o' the Clearway,keeping in mind that 'half of the distance from Liftoff to the screen should be over runway'was the regulation..
I think that with the FAR's(US) recognizing that operations run differently off wet runways(amendment 92) the 15'screen was part o the package??
Elaborations please..
oldebloke is offline  
Old 15th September 2005 | 21:08
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 1,846
Likes: 4
From: Bristol, England
I'm remembering a time when the TORR, engine out, on a wet runway was the gross distance to VLOF. Was that BCARs?
Alex Whittingham is online now  
Old 15th September 2005 | 21:36
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: Worldwide
Alex,

Would need to look at it myself again to be 100% sure, thought it was
1) by TORA - liftoff
2) reduction of the screen height to 15 ft by TODA.
3) reverers thrust available for the reject

Will have another think about it tomorrow.

Zeke is offline  
Old 16th September 2005 | 08:08
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: vancouver oldebloke
Zeke,yes reverser's are to be operable in the wet case.
I believe that the 'new' ruling by the FAA,in Harmonization with EASA stipulate that the 15' screen is at the end of the runway,having used the 'reduced'V1 technique,"in the same manner of reaching 35' at the end of the 'Clearway"(25-92amd)
Ergo the original rule applies that at least half the distance from VLO to the screen must be over runway
oldebloke is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.