Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Boeing unveils nose section of new 787

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Boeing unveils nose section of new 787

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Aug 2005, 12:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeing unveils nose section of new 787

Spirit AeroSystems and Boeing unveiled the first all-composite demonstration nose section for the 787.

The 787 nose has two windows per side compared to three on the rest of Boeing's jetliners. The windows are one and a half times as big as those on the 777.

http://www.radarvector.com/2005/08/b...f-new-787.html
alert5 is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2005, 16:26
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Europe
Age: 63
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Charles Darwin is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2005, 16:29
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Greater Aldergrove
Age: 52
Posts: 851
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks good...seems as if the good looks from the early artists impressions haven't totally disappeared...

Will be very interesting to see how the composites approach develops. Maybe Discovery Wings will enlighten us!
NWSRG is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2005, 17:47
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SEA (or better PAE)
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It will work well, hopefully, when completed. Wait to see the composite barrel, when and if it gets out...
Grunf is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2005, 20:12
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Murica.
Age: 45
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Inspired by the Comet/Caravelle nose maybe???
TIMTS is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2005, 07:28
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Apart from materials used, what is the main difference between the 787 and the existing variants of the 777?
Pin Head is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2005, 00:25
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SEA (or better PAE)
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Too much difference, check Boeing specs and predicted performance to see...

And seat and wait to see announcements related to barrel tests...this design is too advanced to go through (cert authorities approval) without that test
Grunf is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2005, 02:38
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What was old, is new again. Looks like a cleaner Comet to me. Lovely.
Henry Winkler is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2005, 12:52
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: GC Paradise
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
From the photo it looks like pilot vision will be severely retricted aft of abeam the pilots. Looks like the wing leading edges and even the wing tips will be obscured.

Let's hope this is not the case and the final product released by Boeings Flight Test dept will implement windows that will do the job required of them for both air and ground operations.
FlexibleResponse is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2005, 13:31
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Germany
Age: 76
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps the crew will be sat a lot further forward than was previously the case, thanks to some innovations in the cockpit layout? Otherwise, yes, it looks as though they will be blind trying to look over their shoulders. Also, the visibility in turns looks as though it will not win any prizes.
chuks is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2005, 15:48
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Greater Aldergrove
Age: 52
Posts: 851
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Folks,

The 787 has a four piece window set for the cockpit, rather than 6 previously...the crew should be sitting well forward, with two massive side windows to look through!!
NWSRG is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2005, 21:01
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Europe
Age: 63
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the photo it looks like pilot vision will be severely retricted aft of abeam the pilots. Looks like the wing leading edges and even the wing tips will be obscured.
I haven´t seen a wing in years, flying the 757/767.
Charles Darwin is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2005, 13:03
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: GC Paradise
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
A loss of one window on each side equals weight saving, reduced systems complexity, reduced manufacturing and maintenance cost.

A loss of Pilot Compartment View [FAR 25.773 (a)(1)] dressed up as an “improvement”?
FlexibleResponse is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2005, 13:11
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Got an email from Boeing this morning showing pictures of the new flightdeck.
Absolutely stunning. Looks like something from Star Trek.

Check it out at www.newairplane.com
ETOPS773 is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2005, 09:11
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: what U.S. calls ´old Europe´
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder how Boeing is comming from this

to this
???

Must take some filler and hours of sanding to produce the shiny surface ...

Anyway, It´s looking great
Volume is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2005, 19:13
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Greater Aldergrove
Age: 52
Posts: 851
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone know how thick the composite fuselage is in comparisonto a conventional barrel?
NWSRG is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2005, 15:39
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SEA (or better PAE)
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It really depends on intended usage. What I mean is it goes on case by case basis.

What you will come up might be a "thicker" skin (hard to define it this way in case of composites) but significantly lighter and stronger.

Skin thickness starts being a completely different set of problems when you look composite structure since everything is integral.
Grunf is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.