Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

F100 Alignment Dist

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

F100 Alignment Dist

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th July 2005 | 11:38
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: UK
F100 Alignment Dist

Having difficulty getting head around JAR-OPS 1.490(c)(6) Alignment Distance lost in TODA, ASDA and TORA during line-up. The maths is ok but not having all the a/c data that the calculations require is hampering my efforts. All I'm after is distance lost in 90deg r'way entry and 180deg turn.
If there is anyone out there with the data or even better the answers! I would be most grateful.
Mzee is offline  
Old 27th July 2005 | 19:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: vancouver oldebloke
General use is 200'(by the time you've straigthened out)..
cheers
oldebloke is offline  
Old 28th July 2005 | 14:23
  #3 (permalink)  
100 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 25
From: ME
200 feet for a F100? Thats more than we use for a B744!

Mutt
mutt is offline  
Old 28th July 2005 | 17:59
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: vancouver oldebloke
Quite right Mutt,200' was the distance initially used when the'lineup'question first arose in the 70's..Australia is the only country that stipulate the remaining Toda etal after lineup..
I always had the tailfeathers over the lights after the turn in the 320(when needed)..
Isn't there that diagram page in the airframe section of the the AFM to show the turn Radiii?
Cheers

oldebloke is offline  
Old 29th July 2005 | 00:56
  #5 (permalink)  
Fleet Manager
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,448
Likes: 310
From: various places .....
The Oz stuff dates back to the original lineup allowances negotiated for QF, copies of which correspondence I have on file.

While the basic approach is conservative, it is not excessively so and, if my recollection serves me correctly, there is no consideration given to lining up on the centreline ... so it would appear that the 200ft thing is a bit over the top conservative wise ...
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 1st August 2005 | 11:10
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: UK
Thanks for the help, I've at last managed to get the technical data and after using the JAR-OPS fomula I get the following distances that need to be respectively subtracted from the available:

Runway Entry 90º 180º

TODA and TORA 29ft 64ft
ASDA 74ft 109ft

A lot shorter than 200ft - any comments?
Mzee is offline  
Old 7th August 2005 | 03:47
  #7 (permalink)  
100 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 25
From: ME
Certainly sounds better than 200ft...

Anyway this is the way it should be calculated.

TORA/TODA
90° Entry
Rm + X

180° Entry
Rn + Y

ASDA
90° Entry
Rm + X + Wb

180° Entry
Rn + Y + Wb

Where:
X = Safety distance of outer main wheel during turn to the edge of runway.
Y = Safety distance of outer nose wheel during turn to the edge of runway.
Rm = radius of turn of outer main wheel
Rn = radius of turn of outer nose wheel
Wb = Wheel Base


Good Luck.

Mutt
mutt is offline  
Old 7th August 2005 | 06:25
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
From: Tea green International
Mutt is tops

Must be the hoildays...(Eid)....where do you get all your information from.....

My ex chief captain wanted to use reversers.......


Bumz
Bumz_Rush is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.