Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Wait for 5% N1 before anti coll light off?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Wait for 5% N1 before anti coll light off?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Jun 2005, 12:25
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wait for 5% N1 before anti coll light off?

This relates to the new (and confusing) Boeing procedures.
Shut down procedure now states:
-Set park brake.
-Seat belt sign off
-El power on
-Shut down engines
-Anti coll light off

We used to have a requirement to wait for 5% N1 (CFM 56 engines) before turning off the anti coll light. The new procedure does not mention this.

So is this 5% a left over from the old days, or something I should still practise?

Views?
ManaAdaSystem is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2005, 12:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,188
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
Various actions were introduced by airlines to reduce the chances of ground staff moving behind a running down jet engine. Some used 25% N2, others 5% N1, others turned off the anti-collision light switch 30 seconds after closing down the engines.

None of these were specifically Boeing initiated. That is why there has never been mention of these practices in any "official" Boeing checklist procedures. These are company decisions.
Centaurus is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2005, 16:54
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks,

The Company part sort of went out the window when we implemented the new procedures.
I always thought the 5% was to prevent people from getting sucked into the engine?
The question remains, is it dangerous to walk in front (or behind) an engine that has just been shut down?
ManaAdaSystem is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2005, 07:15
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The question remains, is it dangerous to walk in front (or behind) an engine that has just been shut down?
Yes, it is.

We're now carrying out 'turnaround' audits which include observing ground handling staff applying ground power and chocks to the aircraft. If we find anyone approaching the aircraft to do either of these actions before the anti-coll is extinguished, we will interview them. It's one of our top issues.

I'm disappointed to read that this key action isn't included as a specific in some check-lists. It should be the final action, to indicate that the a/c is secure and safe to approach.

It's also dangerous to drive behind an aircraft before the engines are properly shut down.

Is the disappearance from a specific company checklist worth a CHIRPS report? (In the UK)

The Odd One
TheOddOne is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2005, 11:08
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Europe-the sunshine side
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
we use 8% N1...but no value was specified in the new or older OM from Boeing ,so it's specified by the company SOP.
alexban is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2005, 13:29
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,557
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
TheOddOne

Just a question: What are your Company procedures for handling an aircraft arriving with the APU inop?
wiggy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.