Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Flch

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th June 2005 | 16:53
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Flch

I'd like to talk about FLCH please.

For starters, what are its vertical speed limits? Is it a mode that works only with constant rate of descent? When do you choose between V/S and FLCH?

Also what thrust setting does it use? How does it choose a thrust setting?

Why do pilots transition from VNAV to FLCH at the lower levels? What exactly are the benefits?
DoMePlease is offline  
Old 10th June 2005 | 20:42
  #2 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 2
From: Seattle
It depends on the airplane. My experience is with the 744...

The airplane attempts to reach the selected altitude in 2 minutes. It will use thrust from idle to climb thrust to meet that goal at the selected airspeed. If idle or max climb won't make the time goal, it will use the max climb/descent availalbe while holding the airspeed constant.

FLCH controls airspeed more closely than VNAV. FLCH tries to hold it exactly; VNAV has a +/- 15 KIAS tolerance to follow the projected VNAV Path. When expecting vectors off the programmed route, FLCH is more predictable.
Intruder is offline  
Old 11th June 2005 | 05:05
  #3 (permalink)  
Buttonpusher
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 449
Likes: 4
From: Bloody Hell
I think one of the major benefits of going from VNAV to FLCH is speed control, on the 7576's speed control in VNAV is not as accurate as FLCH.FLCH will give you idle throttle in descent and Climb power in the climb, VNAV will vary during descent in order to make any restriction you have entered in the FMC. I generally switch from VNAV to FLCH at 10000' as the default setting on the FMC's (for our birds anyway) is 240 kts. So I'll switch to FLCH to maintain 250kts and not screw up the traffic flow into the airport. Thats my 2 cents worth....
FLCH is offline  
Old 11th June 2005 | 05:21
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: Australia
As Intruder says, it does depend on the airplane, my own experience is with the B777, very similar to the B747-400, but in some others I've flown it's not much more advanced than the basic Speed / Mach hold on earlier aircraft.

I agree with the others here that FLCH does offer tighter speed control than VNAV, but the biggest advantage (to me) is that when the pre-planned expected descent path is not achieved, then FLCH is the only practical alternative. With VNAV the STAR, with all of it's speed schedules is planned and executed exceptionally well by VNAV, but the inevitable Radar vectors giving Track shortening / Lengthening and differing speeds can make VNAV more of a liability than an aid. If the STAR and arrival is flown as planned (rare), then VNAV is wonderful. Properly done, and with appropriate SOPs, VNAV is wonderfully accurate for the non-precision approach.

Regards,

Old Smokey
Old Smokey is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.