Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A380 Landing Gear

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A380 Landing Gear

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Apr 2005, 13:11
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ireland
Age: 43
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A380 Landing Gear

I noticed the A380 landing gear all seem to tilt forward. Does anyone know the reason for this?

I know the A340 centre main gear is the same but the outboard gear tilts backwards.
PIGDOG is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2005, 23:25
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the A340-500/600, the landing gear has to be in the dipped position to avoid fouling the centre doors as they open prior to gear retraction. Once the doors are fully opened, the gear is then signalled to move to the trail position before folding forward and up into the bay.
r304ndy is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2005, 11:34
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: las vegas
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a best practice - "toes down" truck orientation is to be avoided .. this is because if you draw a free body diagram of the post and gear you will see that this orientation contributes to landing gear strut "windup" & "springback" loading which binds the inner & outer cylinders - IE side loads the hell out of the post causing premature strut bearing failures & ladder crecking.& creates wierd dynamics. The only reason to do it is to correct the touch down wheel geometry so as to put all wheels that touch down first on the same longitudinal centerline in the vicinity of the centroid. As with a big swept wing aircraft, the swept wing & body gears are oriented in different locations about the centroid - possibly the body gear forward of the centroid & the wing gears aft of the centroid -& -therfore not on the same centerline - but all will have to contact the earth on landing in concert. Using a toeup & toes down configuration is a trick to solve this problem - exploiting the truckbeam length to put the trailing wheels of the leading trucks "toes up" will place them inline with the trailing trucks nose wheels "toes down" configuration" - otherwise - the airplane on landing will experiance an abrupt pitching moment on landing due to whatever truck touches down first as a result of being either fore or aft of the centerline.
used2flyboeing is offline  
Old 1st May 2005, 09:36
  #4 (permalink)  
PPRuNe Supporter
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Devon, UK
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
used2flyboeing, I am sure I have misunderstood something, in the last sentence of your post you mention a pitching moment occuring, dependent on which truck touches down first, whether it is behind or infront of the centroid. Would not the rearmost trucks always touch down first if the aircraft is pitched nose up?
Tallbloke is offline  
Old 1st May 2005, 11:13
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: OZ
Posts: 1,129
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
used2etc.

I don't think so - check the B767 MLG. Very toes down isn't it? No other wheels to consider. Boeing claims they tilt that way to fit into the wells. Not a bad reason you must admit.

This wheels all in a line stuff might possibly happen in a perfectly flown, perfectly trimmed, perfectly on speed a/c on a perfectly level runway in a perfectly stable airmass with any wind exactly down the runway. Otherwise I think it's a nonsense. I bet a close look at the geometry of the situation will show that the wheels need to point the way they do to fit in.
mustafagander is offline  
Old 1st May 2005, 15:01
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: las vegas
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any landing gear designer would tell you that they "have to put the trucks in some sort of orientation" hence the truck tilt actuator & usually in a toesup position. Airbus & Boeing do use the actuator to position the trucks to fit in the wheel well - as well. THe 777-300 with the semi-levered gear positioner - acts as a landing gear snubber on landing to1) reduce body stress on landing for longer structures life & landing comfort, 2) raise the airplane up prior to takeoff to increase aft body clearance margins to maximize takeoff alpha and hence performance & 3) position truck for stowage. I was addressing why the landing gear on the A340-500/600 was a mixture of toesup & toesdown configurations - again because the body & wing gear are not on the same centerline & exploiting truck beam length to put the wheel where they need to be. Landing gear designers prefer the toeups configuration because of the springback loads generated - again - draw a freebody diagram for yourself & check it out ! I dont think the 767 is a toes down configuration - I dont think they would do a config like that unless they had to because of landing gear stress ..

Tallbloke - if you place the landing gear before or aft of the centroid - the airplane will experiance a pitching moment or heaving fore or aft depending on where the moment of inertia is in relation to the touch down gear ( IE the fulcrum). Not a good thing - some modern fly-by-wire systems use the INS inputs to the PFC to wash in elevator to cancel this phenomenon as a function of pitch rate on landing .. but - better not to have the gear placement problem in the first place ..
used2flyboeing is offline  
Old 2nd May 2005, 02:13
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: OZ
Posts: 1,129
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
used2etc..

Have you seen a B767 in flight with the gear extended?
mustafagander is offline  
Old 2nd May 2005, 23:08
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The Sandpit
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Got to agree with Gander.

767 IS toes down.
mono is offline  
Old 2nd May 2005, 23:38
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bristol UK
Posts: 84
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
THe 777-300 with the semi-levered gear positioner - acts as a landing gear snubber on landing to1) reduce body stress on landing for longer structures life & landing comfort, 2) raise the airplane up prior to takeoff to increase aft body clearance margins to maximize takeoff alpha and hence performance
A330/340 MLG works in a similar manner.
supercarb is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.