Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Dynamic Vs Viscous Hydroplaning

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Dynamic Vs Viscous Hydroplaning

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Apr 2005, 15:27
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Good From Far, Far From Good
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dynamic Vs Viscous Hydroplaning

Hello All,

What is the difference between these two types of aquaplaning with their respective formulae and the differences in their speeds.

Many thanks !!
concordino is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2005, 17:12
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Suitcase....
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dynamic hydroplanning is 9 X square root of the tire pressure. I think viscous hydroplannng can occur at just about any speed and might be more dependent on temperature. Don't hold me to the last statement. However, trying to remember aero after 30+ years is a little difficult.
Phil Squares is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2005, 17:49
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
See FLIGHT SAFETY AUSTRALIA, SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2000 “Slippery when wet”
safetypee is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2005, 10:20
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You might find your answer here:

www.avweb.com/news/airman/184446-1.html

The intro to the article:

"........a new hazard emerges: hydroplaning. It might be great for surfboards, but it's no fun at all when it happens to an airplane on the runway. Bruce Edston explains the three different forms of hydroplaning and offers some prevention strategies."
deeceethree is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2005, 11:51
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Bristol, England
Age: 65
Posts: 1,804
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The classic research on dynamic hydroplaning was conducted by NASA, I think using a Caravelle. Quoting from the NASA Technical Memorandum (NASA-TM-85652):

The contact pressure between tire tread and pavement establishes the escape velocity of bulk water drainage from beneath the tire footprint. High pressure tires can expel surface water more readily from the footprint than low pressure tires. When the aircraft ground speed equals or exceeds the escape velocity of water drainage from the footprint, choked water flow occurs. The tire has now reached a state of total dynamic hydroplaning. Test results .... indicate that the critical aircraft groundspeeds required for this total hydroplaning condition to occur on a flooded (runway water depth is greater than tire tread groove depth) pavements with an unbraked tire are approximately:

Spin-down (rotating tire) speed, knots = 9 x square root of Infl. pressure, psi
Spin-up (nonrotating tire) speed, knots = 7.7 x square root of Infl. pressure, psi

......... It is important that pilots be aware that the lower hydroplaning spin-up speed, rather than the high hydroplaning spin-down speed, represents the actual tire situation for touchdown on flooded runways.
Alex Whittingham is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.