Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Engine prob on B737

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Engine prob on B737

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Apr 2005, 17:45
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: near EDDF
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi ManaAdaSystem

Yes it is your right to refuse an aircraft you are not happy with, but when an engineer sign it you have to accept the delay code 65.

Some examples out of AMM(737NG):
...In very cold weather (outside air temperature less than -4 degrees F (-20 degrees C)), leaks from the drain can occur on an engine that does not operate or during an engine start. These leaks are not unusual, and should stop after the engine operates at minimum idle for 5 minutes...
-------------------------------
or:
Aft Sump (Overboard Drain)
NOTE:
Oil traces at the bottom of exhaust plug, the exhaust sleeve and the turbine rear frame is usual. Oil coking at the flame arrestor and on the rear cover is usual.
NOTE:
An oil puddle in the exhaust plug is usual. After engine dry or wet motoring, a large oil puddle in the exhaust plug is usual.
...
Serviceable limit:
1) After an engine shutdown only, there is not more than 60 cc/hr (20 drops per minute).

( after 2,5 hours you have 0,15 liter of oil which can produce a 30 inch diameter pool of oil)
-------------------------------
or ...
-------------------------------
So if I do a test run and there is no leak I sign it.
Seals at the engine are designed to withheld fluids under pressure. If there is no pressure they could leak.
Therefore every task to identify the leak starts with a idle run or even with a part power run.
But I must say, that I didn´t sign off anything blind according AMM. When the AMM says OK but my experience (or should I say feeling) say NO, I decide for safety. I think that every engineer must have backbend* to say NO!
Safety must be the first choice without splitting hairs. So everyone is doing his job.

Ingo
*(I just translate the German wording "Rückrad" witch means that you stay at your opinion even when it is against the policy)
IFixPlanes is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2005, 07:39
  #22 (permalink)  
LEM
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You don't mess with Ingo.

LEM is offline  
Old 4th May 2005, 21:14
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Near LHR
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have no engine experience on 737's to speak of, but the talk of pad seals and so on above sounds reminiscent of the cement mixer technology found in the JT9 accessory gearbox.

Whenever we had a problem like this on one of those engines we'd perform a breather pressure check to find which of the carbon seals or mount pad seals was the culprit. It usually turned out to be more than one. Is such a thing as a breather pressure check possible on 737s?

That said, the only time a JT9 wasn't leaking was when the oil tank was empty.
prop jocket is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.