Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

cold temp corrections

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

cold temp corrections

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Feb 2005, 15:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cold temp corrections

My company adjusts the DA and MDA for cold temperature. We have table we can use or you calculate with the rule of thumb: every 1000', every degree nonstandard ads 4 feet to DA. Do other companies use the cold wtemp corrections on DA/MDA as wel? ( I know in the states you don't)

greetings
flyburg is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2005, 15:58
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think that the official calculation for the general rule is:

4% for every 11 Deg C.

VRT
VRThomas is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2005, 16:11
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: vancouver oldebloke
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Defiinite part of the Canadian AIP...All Alt's are compensated for cold temps in the approach and terminal(minimum radar vectors are modified)...The pro' ceedure turn,FAF DH/MDA and go-around alts should be considered in the 'briefing'
oldebloke is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2005, 17:49
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In fact...
In Canada, Jeppesen will provide you with a chart that shows the corrected alts for temps below 0 for any requested airport.

Pretty slick and no reason why they shouldn't be used EVERYWHERE!

VRT
VRThomas is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2005, 20:25
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: .
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many airlines use ICAO Cold Temperature Error Tables. This is also the case in the US. Various FAA circulars and documents are discussing this issue and gives examples of how SOPs should include this information. Not too long ago the FAA iussued temperature restriction for using BARO-VNAV approaches.
80/20 is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2005, 20:52
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,346
Received 19 Likes on 10 Posts
baro VNAV approaches have a cold temperature correction built into the calculation of the final approach obstacle surface - it is normally based on the coldest forecast aerodrome temperature -5C rounded down to the next lowest 5C. This temperature is published as the lowest value for which the procedure is valid.
reynoldsno1 is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2005, 14:47
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the replies,

Yes oldebloke, you're right not only the da/mda but all alts need to be corrected. I was just curious wether other countries applied them as wel. I used to fly for a 121 carrier in the states for 4 years and never even heard of it, definitely not part of comp sop's. Called some old buddies that have moved to the US majors (well, most are furloughed lately) and they had never heard of it either. Hence my curiousity how other countries applied them.

Thanks

P.s. I guess in Canada they become somewhat more important with the cold temps :-)
flyburg is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2005, 15:13
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Snowland
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well I can assure you that any scandinavian operator will correct their altitudes....it ends up being a thousand feet or more sometimes brrr
Kilo-club SNA is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2005, 18:56
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Sunrise Senior Living
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is quite often hidden in the depths of the Ops Man Gen and quietly forgotten. Should be applied at or below ISA-15?

Cheers,
mcdhu
mcdhu is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2005, 19:59
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: havetocallthereception
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
recently during a landing at fairbanks/alaska I noticed a strong temp inversion,which basically would have been resulted in a too high altitude if we would have added a temp correction because of cold wx on the ground.

my colleague told me this is quite common in alaska/canada,I was wondering if somebody from that region could comment on that.

I don't see much sense in adding a correction on the DA,since the difference would even in extreme circumstations be minor,am I wrong?

cheers
corporal klinger is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2005, 21:41
  #11 (permalink)  
BLE
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: A cold, windy place
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grrr

The formula for correction to cold temperatures is to add 4% altitude (QFE / AGL) for every 10 C below ISA from the reporting source.

You will find it in Jepps ATC chapter, and in most JAA operators manuals.

My experience is only scandinavian + canadian operators understand and perform this correction as a part of SOP.

The number of blank stares I have received from co-pilots, training captains and examiners elsewhere in the world when briefing this procedure, is just mind boggling.

A quick example common in many airports these days:

A sea level airport reporting a temp of -10C will need a correction of 10% (ISA -25, 4+4+2%) to MSA, MEA, MORA and all altitudes below.

If your MEA is 5000`, this is now corrected to 5500.
Flying a glideslope in these conditions will easily show you how important the corrections are.
If published GS intercept is 3000`at 10 NM, maintain 3300` indicated until 10NM and you will see the GS intercepting excactly at 3300` and 10NM.

Outer marker passage on the GS will occur at 2200` instead of 2000`.
A 200`DA will only need to be corrected by 20`, which is hardly noticable.


Flying non-precision approaches in very cold temps can easily make you a CFIT statistic. Remember the MSA is 1000` regardless
of terrain below/above 5000`.
Descending to the MSA of 8000` in ISA - 10C will only give you 200` AGL clearance. Add some wind, and I hope your GPWS is capable of saving your hide!


You as a pilot better do it, ATC will not. The only exception is being radar vectored in Canada, where they correct MVA for non standard temps.

Flying baro VNAV in these conditions will require you to have the FMS correct by manually enter aiport temp if possible, or applying the corrected altitude to the approach altitudes in the FMS.

A life saving rule of thumb is to add 10% to MEA, MSA, IAF, DA , MDA etc. when the airport reports temps down to -10C. Add 20% when down to -30C. Any colder, get the book out, or stay home!
BLE is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2005, 01:09
  #12 (permalink)  
IHL
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Chart is from the Canadian CAP( Approach charts) Gen.

The Canadian AIP is online at : Temperature correction RAC 9-14[ hperlink does not appear to be working]




[IMG][/IMG]

http://www.tc.gc.ca/CivilAviation/Re...-RAC-01-05.pdf [/URL]
IHL is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2005, 07:44
  #13 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Done 'to death' many times on this forum. Try 'search' for 'cold weather altimeter' or 'altimeter corrections'. A couple of good frighteners in there too for those who doubt
BOAC is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.