B737 Isolation valve AUTO position
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
B737 Isolation valve AUTO position
I'm having trouble understanding the reasoning behind the AUTO position of the isolation valve in the B737NG pneumatic system.
I understand what pack and bleed switch positions make the valve open or close, but can't find an explanation of why.
If you were to turn off one PACK switch with the ISOLATION VALVE switch in AUTO, the isolation valve would open and let the two engines bleeds share the load of the remaining pack. Makes sense to me.
However, why does the isolation valve open automatically if you were to turn off one of the ENGINE BLEED switches? This would leave one engine bleed trying to supply air to both packs. The operating manual states that one engine should at no times be used to run both packs.
Hope this makes sense to someone. Thanks.
I understand what pack and bleed switch positions make the valve open or close, but can't find an explanation of why.
If you were to turn off one PACK switch with the ISOLATION VALVE switch in AUTO, the isolation valve would open and let the two engines bleeds share the load of the remaining pack. Makes sense to me.
However, why does the isolation valve open automatically if you were to turn off one of the ENGINE BLEED switches? This would leave one engine bleed trying to supply air to both packs. The operating manual states that one engine should at no times be used to run both packs.
Hope this makes sense to someone. Thanks.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Cakov, to me also that's a mistery!
As you say, there is no reason for that, and it could even be annoying to have one bleed trying to supply both packs.
We also have to bother turning it to close for a no engine bleed take off, instead of just turning both bleeds off.
We've probably missed something, but what?
As you say, there is no reason for that, and it could even be annoying to have one bleed trying to supply both packs.
We also have to bother turning it to close for a no engine bleed take off, instead of just turning both bleeds off.
We've probably missed something, but what?
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Far away from civilisation
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is because of wing anti-ice.
If you get a problem with one bleed due to bleed trip off or eng. failure, you have to switch off the pack on the affected side.
The wing anti-ice situation though is a bit contradicting. In the bleed trip off c.l. is written 'avoid icing conditions', in the eng. fail./shutdown c.l. not. May be because N-1 you are altitude limited (weather).
If you get a problem with one bleed due to bleed trip off or eng. failure, you have to switch off the pack on the affected side.
The wing anti-ice situation though is a bit contradicting. In the bleed trip off c.l. is written 'avoid icing conditions', in the eng. fail./shutdown c.l. not. May be because N-1 you are altitude limited (weather).
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Alaskan Timber, we understand the logic with the pack switches.
What we're having trouble with is the logic with the bleed switches, in relation to the isolation valve automatically opening.
Nothing to do with antiice or the cklists you mention
What we're having trouble with is the logic with the bleed switches, in relation to the isolation valve automatically opening.
Nothing to do with antiice or the cklists you mention
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Far away from civilisation
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey LEM,
This is a precaution. If a bleed trips off while in icing conditions, your wings will still equally be anti(de)-iced. Apparently it is not a big thing to fly with 2 packs on 1 bleed for a couple of minutes.
This is all my own theory. So if I am wrong, I am bracing for impact.
This is a precaution. If a bleed trips off while in icing conditions, your wings will still equally be anti(de)-iced. Apparently it is not a big thing to fly with 2 packs on 1 bleed for a couple of minutes.
This is all my own theory. So if I am wrong, I am bracing for impact.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Europe-the sunshine side
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LEM ,as AT said in case of bleed trip off light you'll have to select also affected side pack off- so no 2 packs on only one engine bleed. That's qrh.
The valve will open automatically when you select bleed off-when you select manually the switch to off-it won't trip by itself- so you'll have ram air for systems that require it i.e. hydraulics pressurization,water,etc.
Due to high bleed load it is not recommended to use wing antiice,it can result in the second bleed to trip off --loss of presurization.
It is stated in the qrh that you should avoid iceing conditions for this reason.
Brgds Alex
The valve will open automatically when you select bleed off-when you select manually the switch to off-it won't trip by itself- so you'll have ram air for systems that require it i.e. hydraulics pressurization,water,etc.
Due to high bleed load it is not recommended to use wing antiice,it can result in the second bleed to trip off --loss of presurization.
It is stated in the qrh that you should avoid iceing conditions for this reason.
Brgds Alex
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not really an expert on the 737, but have you considered the idea that the hydraulic reservoirs need to be pressurized?
On the 767, each pneumatic duct will pressurize its respective hyd reservor - maybe this applies for the 737 aswell? (2 ducts - 2 hyd systems)
Should a hyd reservoir not be pressurized for a longer time, cavitation may occur (especially at high altitudes) which may cause damage to the hyd pumps.
Just a theory...
Regards,
Mark
On the 767, each pneumatic duct will pressurize its respective hyd reservor - maybe this applies for the 737 aswell? (2 ducts - 2 hyd systems)
Should a hyd reservoir not be pressurized for a longer time, cavitation may occur (especially at high altitudes) which may cause damage to the hyd pumps.
Just a theory...
Regards,
Mark
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alaskan Timber,
You mentioned the situation of a bleed trip off.
However, with the ISOLATION VALVE in AUTO position, the valve will only open when one of the BLEED AIR switches is selected off, the manual doesn't mention anything about a trip off.
Just like Cakov, I've been struggling with this question for a long time. I've asked several people on the line, but nobody has given me a reasonable answer so far.
Regards,
FC
You mentioned the situation of a bleed trip off.
However, with the ISOLATION VALVE in AUTO position, the valve will only open when one of the BLEED AIR switches is selected off, the manual doesn't mention anything about a trip off.
Just like Cakov, I've been struggling with this question for a long time. I've asked several people on the line, but nobody has given me a reasonable answer so far.
Regards,
FC
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Exactly, gentlemen. Some of you are missing the point.
Once again, we are asking about the positioning of the bleed switch to off.
For what reason this should automatically open the isolation valve?
As stated, it could even be annoying!
AT & Alex
Initially, if you don't touch anything, NO!
The isolation valve will remain closed.
It won't automatically open.
How do you force it to open? By turning the pack switch OFF, not the bleed switch.
Again, in the nonnormal situations we are talking of, we have to move the PACK SWITCH, NOT THE BLEED SWITCH, to off!
Once again, we are asking about the positioning of the bleed switch to off.
For what reason this should automatically open the isolation valve?
As stated, it could even be annoying!
AT & Alex
If a bleed trips off while in icing conditions, your wings will still equally be anti(de)-iced.
The isolation valve will remain closed.
It won't automatically open.
How do you force it to open? By turning the pack switch OFF, not the bleed switch.
Again, in the nonnormal situations we are talking of, we have to move the PACK SWITCH, NOT THE BLEED SWITCH, to off!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Agreed - if you turn off the pack switch, the isolation valve opens. (And this is what the QRH tells us to do for a bleed trip off.)
So we are still no further forward in resolving why Boeing included the automatic opening of the isolation valve if you turn off a bleed switch.
Or am I missing something? (Thoroughly possible, I hasten to add!)
So we are still no further forward in resolving why Boeing included the automatic opening of the isolation valve if you turn off a bleed switch.
Or am I missing something? (Thoroughly possible, I hasten to add!)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Far away from civilisation
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey LEM, Funnel Cloud and Cakov,
Your remarks regarding the eng. bleed or pack 'switch' postion with isolation valve switch in 'auto' are correct. My memory is back on track.
Your remarks regarding the eng. bleed or pack 'switch' postion with isolation valve switch in 'auto' are correct. My memory is back on track.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Europe-the sunshine side
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ka8 is of course right..
There are systems on a plane,other then air conditioning or anti-ice that require air from the bleeds to properly work i.e. hydraulics or water system should be pressurized to properly function.
If you have a bleed trip off-the valve will remain closed,if in AUTO.
Then you select the pack switch to off-thus causing the valve to open (if in AUTO)
The reason for this is, not to be able to use the wing antiice-this is said to be avoided by the QRH (might cause the other bleed to fail)
The reason is to have pressure in the ram on both 'sides' ,thus being able to pressurize both hyd sys,water sys..
And you won't have at any time two pack's on one source,due to the qrh instructions to close affected pack.
FC,LEM I hope this helps..
Brgds Alex
There are systems on a plane,other then air conditioning or anti-ice that require air from the bleeds to properly work i.e. hydraulics or water system should be pressurized to properly function.
If you have a bleed trip off-the valve will remain closed,if in AUTO.
Then you select the pack switch to off-thus causing the valve to open (if in AUTO)
The reason for this is, not to be able to use the wing antiice-this is said to be avoided by the QRH (might cause the other bleed to fail)
The reason is to have pressure in the ram on both 'sides' ,thus being able to pressurize both hyd sys,water sys..
And you won't have at any time two pack's on one source,due to the qrh instructions to close affected pack.
FC,LEM I hope this helps..
Brgds Alex
Last edited by alexban; 10th Feb 2005 at 09:46.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Far away from civilisation
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey Alexban,
Don't think this is the main reason. In case of a bleed trip off you leave the eng. bleed 'switch' in the on position. Only the affected pack is switched off. This opens the isolation valve aswell (in auto).
Actually there is not one situation (in the QRH) were an eng. bleed 'switch' is placed to off, with the isolation valve switch left in auto.
It is not always possible to avoid icing conditions, in this case wing anti-ice could still be required. Above fl 350 wing anti-ice could also cause a bleed trip off with both bleeds working.
Coming back to the question of Cakov. IMHO the function of the eng. bleed 'switch' position in relation to the isol. valve (in auto) is just a back up function. In case an eng. bleed switch is for what ever reason in the wrong postion during moderate icing, then at least both wings are de-iced. Further you could use this function, on the ground, as a handy tool (several possibilities to control the isol. valve).
Once again this is all theory. Nothing found in the books about this.
Don't think this is the main reason. In case of a bleed trip off you leave the eng. bleed 'switch' in the on position. Only the affected pack is switched off. This opens the isolation valve aswell (in auto).
Actually there is not one situation (in the QRH) were an eng. bleed 'switch' is placed to off, with the isolation valve switch left in auto.
It is not always possible to avoid icing conditions, in this case wing anti-ice could still be required. Above fl 350 wing anti-ice could also cause a bleed trip off with both bleeds working.
Coming back to the question of Cakov. IMHO the function of the eng. bleed 'switch' position in relation to the isol. valve (in auto) is just a back up function. In case an eng. bleed switch is for what ever reason in the wrong postion during moderate icing, then at least both wings are de-iced. Further you could use this function, on the ground, as a handy tool (several possibilities to control the isol. valve).
Once again this is all theory. Nothing found in the books about this.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Europe-the sunshine side
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AT -my friend,the fact that the bleed switch is left in the ON position after 'bleed trip off'light doesnt's mean that you'll have bleed pressure from that engine.
So bleed trip off ---no pressure on that side of ram. (no matter what you do with the bleed switch)
Next step from QRH ---select pack affected side OFF--valve in auto will open--pressure again for the systems I've told you before.
About the bleed switch relation to the isol.valve ,hmm.
In flight ,as you say ,if by whatever reason you select bleed off-then you'll have two packs on the same source.If you add also anti-ice I bet you'll fail the other bleed also.
So,as LEM said ,annoying.
On ground,you'll have one pack operating (classic)--valve is already open.(in auto)
Selecting bleeds to off ,indeed will command a 'special'high flow on the operating pack,but has nothing to do with the valve (it's already open)
So bleed trip off ---no pressure on that side of ram. (no matter what you do with the bleed switch)
Next step from QRH ---select pack affected side OFF--valve in auto will open--pressure again for the systems I've told you before.
About the bleed switch relation to the isol.valve ,hmm.
In flight ,as you say ,if by whatever reason you select bleed off-then you'll have two packs on the same source.If you add also anti-ice I bet you'll fail the other bleed also.
So,as LEM said ,annoying.
On ground,you'll have one pack operating (classic)--valve is already open.(in auto)
Selecting bleeds to off ,indeed will command a 'special'high flow on the operating pack,but has nothing to do with the valve (it's already open)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Far away from civilisation
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey Alexban,
You edited your post after my latest reply. I am 100% sure you wrote initially that after a bleed trip off you select the 'bleed' switch to off. You changed that to 'pack' switch. My reply was partly referring to that. Makes me look a bit like a fool don't you think so ? Editing is ment for grammar corrections, not to change the contents of your post.
Were did I write that after a eng. bleed trip off light with the bleed switch on, bleed pressure is still available from that engine?
Referring to my theory about the bleed switch position as a back up (isol. valve sw. in auto). Indeed it is just a theory. For the rest
I am fully aware again (as I already wrote) about the isol. valve position with the switch in auto in relation to eng. bleed switch or pack switch postion.
You edited your post after my latest reply. I am 100% sure you wrote initially that after a bleed trip off you select the 'bleed' switch to off. You changed that to 'pack' switch. My reply was partly referring to that. Makes me look a bit like a fool don't you think so ? Editing is ment for grammar corrections, not to change the contents of your post.
Were did I write that after a eng. bleed trip off light with the bleed switch on, bleed pressure is still available from that engine?
Referring to my theory about the bleed switch position as a back up (isol. valve sw. in auto). Indeed it is just a theory. For the rest
I am fully aware again (as I already wrote) about the isol. valve position with the switch in auto in relation to eng. bleed switch or pack switch postion.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Europe-the sunshine side
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AT,indeed you are right.After reading your answer I've realised,not only that I've written 'bleed' instead of 'pack' ,but also that I missread the question initially asked by cavok.So,i've edited my previous answer, although I was tempted to delete it,but you've already answered it.And I usually try to write correct stuff,even if I'm tired,so I had to correct my answer.
Regarding the original question I'll try to dig further maybe I'll find some answer.
Regarding the original question I'll try to dig further maybe I'll find some answer.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Assume that airplane was configured with wing TAI "on" at the time that another problem caused the crew to switch "off" one of the engine bleeds.
At no time during the QRH actions to resolve the bleed fault would the airplane be asymmetrically wing anti-iced, i.e. one problem doesn't give you a much bigger problem.
I think this may be the reason for the auto function of the isolation valve being associated with engine bleed switch position.
At no time during the QRH actions to resolve the bleed fault would the airplane be asymmetrically wing anti-iced, i.e. one problem doesn't give you a much bigger problem.
I think this may be the reason for the auto function of the isolation valve being associated with engine bleed switch position.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: TANZANIA
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alaskan Timber
You wrote this
==
Above fl 350 wing anti-ice could also cause a bleed trip off with both bleeds working.
==
I have seen this info elsewhere twice and it was also stated that you can even lose pressurization of the aircraft , when this happens, now where is this source stated officially by Boeing ?
Zenj
You wrote this
==
Above fl 350 wing anti-ice could also cause a bleed trip off with both bleeds working.
==
I have seen this info elsewhere twice and it was also stated that you can even lose pressurization of the aircraft , when this happens, now where is this source stated officially by Boeing ?
Zenj