Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A320-100 v.s. A320-200

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A320-100 v.s. A320-200

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Dec 2004, 22:33
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A320-100 v.s. A320-200

Hi,

From the point of the pilot what is the difference between the A320-100 and A320-200?

Thanks

C152pilot
c152pilot is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2004, 22:52
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Greater Aldergrove
Age: 53
Posts: 851
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Initially anyway, the 200 had longer range.

Not sure if the convention still holds. Airbus.com is fairly comprehensive.
NWSRG is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2004, 05:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 5 -100's we have at BA (G-BUSB-BUSF) are pretty useless as a commercial proposition if the truth be told. To show you what I mean, the weights we use are (-200 CFM in brackets for comparison).

Max ZFW 59,000kg (60,500)
Max Land 63,000kg (64,500)
Max T/O 68,000kg (73,500)

I have had had a situation where wx at LHR had me planned to land at LHR at max ZFW and at max landing weight with 4,000kg fuel (about 1100kg reserve + (say) 1600kg MAN div giving 1300kg contingency + extra (1300kg is about 35-40 mins holding capacity). That gave a max trip fuel of 5000kg, or a range of only 2 hours. In other words Oslo, Prague, Vienna, Madrid are max range in these circumstances. If you are going somewhere with a more distant alternate, then they really are little better than useless.

In comparison. the -200CFM's (and IAE's) allow you to all of the above and carry an extra 5500kgs fuel (extra 2:15 range).

HTH
TopBunk is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2004, 08:52
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd just like to clarify TopBunk's post...
are pretty useless as a commercial proposition if the truth be told
That need not be true, especially for an airline that has numerous sectors shorter than:
In other words Oslo, Prague, Vienna, Madrid are max range in these circumstances
But for reasons best known to BA, they are unable to restrict the 100-s to domestic and short European sectors, and keep trying to prove TopBunk's point. They even sent one to IST one day!!

As ever, it does what it says on the tin.

From the point of the pilot what is the difference between the A320-100 and A320-200?
Ref your other post, when you look out of the window, both winglets seem to have knocked off... you don't have to worry about a forward CG limit that applies to the -200s, and I think that's about it.

HTH
NigelOnDraft is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2004, 13:07
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: KSA Litter Box
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes, I agree. Totally....
HRWaterhose is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.