Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Selectioon of incorrect thrust setting on approach

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Selectioon of incorrect thrust setting on approach

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th December 2004 | 20:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Ireland
Question Selectioon of incorrect thrust setting on approach

Hi,

Got a query for the pilots out there.

If you were on approach and the FADEC was reset and on power up, instead of the thrust setting being Go-Around, it selected Take-Off - what if anything would you notice and how would it make the plane more difficult to control.

Thanks.
gerard is offline  
Old 21st December 2004 | 00:18
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: Timbuktu
Several items in that scenario need further elucidation, but to address your main question...if you're talking Airbus, and the a/c is on approach, the difference between TO power and GA power would be negligible or zero.

In fact Airbus name this power setting as TOGA.

Therefore it would not make the plane more difficult to control.

Why would you reset the FADEC on final approach?
maxalt is offline  
Old 22nd December 2004 | 13:56
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Ireland
Sorry - I meant a power interrupt.

Do airlines not have the option to request their thrust settings - ie either for performance, relaibility or efficiency.

What is the idea behind the derated options? Are they for weather/runway conditions?

Is there not the possibility that Take-off could be different to Go-Around.

Although they are the same, I think there is the possibility for them to be different.

Thanks.
gerard is offline  
Old 22nd December 2004 | 23:32
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: Timbuktu
Do airlines not have the option to request their thrust settings - ie either for performance, relaibility or efficiency.
Not quite sure what you're getting at here.
What is the idea behind the derated options? Are they for weather/runway conditions?
I think you might be referring to FLEXIBLE take off thrust. This is an approved method for reducing Take Off power to save wear and tear on engines.

Derating is slightly more complex and has to do with an engineered permaneant reduction in the available thrust of the engine in all conditions, and the pilot has no control over this reduction.
Sometimes that term DERATE gets misused and confused with the terms "Flexible T/O Thrust" or "Reduced T/O Thrust".
Is there not the possibility that Take-off could be different to Go-Around. Although they are the same, I think there is the possibility for them to be different.
Again I think you are referring to the FLEX T/O option. In that scenario, yes, there is indeed a difference between the T/O power which you are using and the full T/O power actually available.
But if you need to obtain full power all you have to do is push the thrust levers forward into the TOGA detent on the throttle quadrant.

Does this answer your question?
maxalt is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.