Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

B737 Duct Residual Pressure

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

B737 Duct Residual Pressure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Dec 2004, 19:59
  #1 (permalink)  
LEM
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B737 Duct Residual Pressure

Was dispatched today with Wing Body Overheat.
Following the procedure (isolation valve closed, pack&bleed off)
I expected the press in the duct to fall to zero, but instead it remained at 40 psi in climb and 20 in cruise!

After several reset, also inverting the situation (right and left), problem confirmed.

I'd like to ask the excellent engineers we have on Pprune if this is usual for an old airplane, maybe, to have the bleed valves not closing properly.

Thanks
LEM is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2004, 20:26
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Oz
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

I have not worked on B737 however on other types I have worked on the residual pressure should be zero. I would right this up as it appears the isolation valve was not fully closed and therefore the area not isolated correctly.

Cheers
Trash Hauler is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2004, 10:25
  #3 (permalink)  
LEM
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The isolation valve, when we checked it on the ground using APU bleed, seemed to isolate perfectly (40 psi on the left side, ZERO on the right one).

Just to complicate things further...
LEM is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2004, 13:06
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did you notice duct pressure changes when opening or retarding the appropiate thrust lever for the closed ducting?
And did it change when you opened up or closed the thrust lever on the other side?
When opening up the isolation valve, did the pressure between both sides equalize?

Trying to do some fault diagnosis here, cos having any indication is absolutely not right
Shaka Zulu is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2004, 16:07
  #5 (permalink)  

UkEng
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: England
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd say the PRSOV is leaking.
If the isolation valve is closed (as proved by yourselves using APU air on the ground) and you're getting air on the right system , the only place it can be coming from is the No 2 engine bleed air.
With Bleed off the PRSOV should be closed but it's possible it's not sealing properly.
Doesn't really help with the original snag as you'll still be getting hot bleed air in the ducting.

Edit - CFM powered 737's normally have PRSOV's which are spring loaded closed. What did your MEL say about locking out the PRSOV?
ukeng is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2004, 18:06
  #6 (permalink)  
LEM
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did you notice duct pressure changes when opening or retarding the appropiate thrust lever for the closed ducting?

Affirm!

And did it change when you opened up or closed the thrust lever on the other side?

Didn't try asymmetrical thrust inflight. Should have done it!

When opening up the isolation valve, did the pressure between both sides equalize?

Affirm, isolation valve worked as advertised (tried on the ground only).


With Bleed off the PRSOV should be closed but it's possible it's not sealing properly.

That's what we thought, but amazingly this happened on BOTH sides, althought less on the left one (15 to 20 psi in cruise, 20 to 40 on the right one).
That's why I'm suspecting all old airplanes might present the same glitch

What did your MEL say about locking out the PRSOV?

There was no maintenance action, just operational (avoid icing bla bla bla...)
LEM is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2004, 06:48
  #7 (permalink)  
LEM
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Affirm, ASFKAP, then it rises again when the pack is turned off again.


Actually, the proper closing of the bleed valves is almost never confirmed in normal ops, and I'm sure we would find out interesting statistics if we checked every airplane!
LEM is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2004, 06:35
  #8 (permalink)  
LEM
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It also suggests to me that your original snag was an erroneous wing/body ovht indication problem rather than an actual duct leak.
Exactly, ASFKAP.


If they give me more details, I'll let you know.

Thanks.
LEM is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.