Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

737-700 M. E. L.

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

737-700 M. E. L.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th November 2004 | 17:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: North America
Question 737-700 M. E. L.

Does anyone know if the autopilot is on the B737-700 MEL?
lead zeppelin is offline  
Old 15th November 2004 | 18:11
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: Western Europe
2 installed, 0 required except for ER OPS provided:
1) Approach minimums do not require their use,
2) Enroute operations do not require autopilot use, and
3) Number of flight segments and segment duration is acceptable to the flight crew.
Operators should make every effort to repair the autopilots early in the repair interval, as provided by this relief statement, in consideration of such factors as weather, traffic density, and the effects of other inoperative systems.
speech is offline  
Old 15th November 2004 | 18:12
  #3 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 4
From: EGGW
Talking

I would think that no aircraft , would have the Auto Pilot in the MEL.
You do not need an Auto Pilot to fly an aircraft. You would need it seviceable for auto land, that goes without saying.
If you do need it, then the next thing will be a coffee maker as well.
I may be wrong?
Mr @ Spotty M is offline  
Old 15th November 2004 | 18:13
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
From: UK
Plus wont be able RVSM if both are broke.
The Greaser is offline  
Old 15th November 2004 | 19:53
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 775
Likes: 2
From: near EDDF
@speech

additional Info:
If both auto pilots are inoperative, the repair interval is "B"
Category B. Items in this category shall be repaired within three (3) consecutive calendar days (72
hours), excluding the day the malfunction was recorded in the aircraft maintenance record/logbook


Ingo
IFixPlanes is offline  
Old 15th November 2004 | 20:01
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: North America
Many thanks, Gentlemen - you have been most helpful!

lead zeppelin is offline  
Old 15th November 2004 | 21:29
  #7 (permalink)  
Maxiumus
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mr @ Spotty M
If it was not in the MEL, then you couldn't go without. If you can go without, it would have to be in the MEL.
 
Old 15th November 2004 | 22:36
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: North America
I am not unable to not understand what you aren't not trying to not say.
lead zeppelin is offline  
Old 16th November 2004 | 00:40
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
From: Brisbane, Australia
I don't think at this stage that I agree!
Flight Detent is offline  
Old 16th November 2004 | 01:45
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: HKG
If it was not in the MEL, then you couldn't go without. If you can go without, it would have to be in the MEL.

not necessarily true, if something not in MEL, it is at the pilot's discretion to take or not.
H721 is offline  
Old 16th November 2004 | 05:03
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: Here and there.
I can't comment on 737s, however the local CAA may have an input into what goes into an MEL. For instance a 767 in OZ is required to have 2 out of 3 autopilots serviceable for dispatch.
RaTa is offline  
Old 16th November 2004 | 09:13
  #12 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Edinburgh, UK
The local regulatory authorirty will indeed have an influence on the contents of the Minimum Equipment List. This is a operators document that must be agreed and approved by their regulator. It may be more but not less restrictive than the Master Minimum Equipment List ie Boeing's.
Most are content to stick pretty close to the MMEL.
avoman is offline  
Old 16th November 2004 | 09:17
  #13 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Aviation Qualifications: AME
Posts: 4,183
Likes: 1,119
From: UK
H721
not necessarily true, if something not in MEL, it is at the pilot's discretion to take or not.
How does that work then?

EG

Item A u/s.

Item A not in MEL.

Hands up the number of Licensed Engineers who would sign that off? And with what Reference? 05-01?

Who do you fly for H721? I'm not having a go, I just wondered if your country's regulations were different to mine that's all.
TURIN is offline  
Old 16th November 2004 | 09:46
  #14 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Edinburgh, UK
H721 may be thinking of non-airworthiness items which find their way into the defect list. If not rectified they can be transferred to the 'level 2' or 'B' deferred defects. These items are not mentioned in the MEL. For example, that little piece of carpet behind the captain's seat. Might be frayed, it is not in the MEL, but it will not stop you flying.
avoman is offline  
Old 16th November 2004 | 11:16
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 85
From: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
H721,

I don't agree. If there is a defect and it is not listed in the MEL, the aircraft cannot be dispatched. If it IS in the MEL, it is still at the pilots discretion to NOT accept the aircraft.
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 16th November 2004 | 11:22
  #16 (permalink)  
Maxiumus
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wizofoz, quite correct I think. I would never dispatch at discretion on a non-MEL item.
 
Old 16th November 2004 | 11:53
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: UK
Spotty M, get real,everybody knows that a u/s bevmaker is a stopper!(Even it was in the MEL which it aint.)

HOMER SIMPSONS LOVECHILD is offline  
Old 16th November 2004 | 12:08
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: ME
If memory serves, the BAe ATP has two autopilots fitted and at least one HAD to be serviceable to allow any dispatch. Is this still the case ?
giovane is offline  
Old 16th November 2004 | 14:43
  #19 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: North America
My original question concerns Canada, (Westjet, actually).

But, I do appreciate all the input - very informative.......thanks, all.
lead zeppelin is offline  
Old 16th November 2004 | 15:43
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: HKG
Wizofoz, Maxiumus & TURIN

I don't have a MEL next to me now but how about,

scenario 1,
jumbo feighter the potable tank can't be filled, can't we load bottlesss of water instead? might be no hot coffee for a coffee-loving pilot.

scenario 2,
a passenger door slide cannot be disarm from the exterior handle (but ok from interior handle). full passenger loading expected. can't we tell the next station not to open from outside?

case 2 maybe more debatable but I should say in both cases the pilot has the right not to take it.

professionals are being paid premium for solving problems acceptable to most people. we have to navigate through the niche part of engineering & operations world.

I'm not saying we can dispatch something in the MEL saying 1 installed, 1 required. just something not listed in the MEL then our chance to think/ask go or not.

Who do you fly for H721? I'm not having a go, I just wondered if your country's regulations were different to mine that's all

TURIN, from your profile you are from uk. for your interest my section L a & c licence examinations are both conducted by uk surveyors.

Last edited by H721; 16th November 2004 at 16:01.
H721 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.