Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

747 EPR settings

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

747 EPR settings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Nov 2004, 16:36
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: canada
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
747 EPR settings

anyone out there willing to give a little information on approximate EPR settings for the 200 in the approach and landing configuration as well as clean 280 and 250 KIAS respectively?

thanks
rjer is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2004, 16:55
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
IIRC (it has been 3 years since I last flew it), on the approach it was approximately 1.08 (PW -7J engines) or 1.18 (RB211 engines). Can't remember for 280/250 KIAS.
LOMCEVAK is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2004, 12:01
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: thailand
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which engine? The B-747 used Jt9d- and RB211524--
callout is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2004, 20:04
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
figures for rb211-524D4
clean 250 kts level flight pitch 5 deg n up 285 tons 1.18 EPR
approach F30 285 tons 3 deg g/slope 1.6 deg n/up 1.20 epr
fire wall is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2004, 05:16
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: everywhere
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rjer
If you're prepping for an upcoming Cathay sim ride, they'll give the figures to you at the brief.
policepilot is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2004, 10:30
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,787
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
As the first 747s I flew had GEs, I still prefer using N1s to EPR. A good rule of thumb for the GEs on the approach was 60% plus the middle digit of your weight in tonnes. So at 220 tonnes LW you would use 62% and at 270 tonnes, 67%. Now I fly with Pratts, and it seems to work with those too. But not sure about Rollers. Can anyone say if it's the same?
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2004, 11:16
  #7 (permalink)  
LGB
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: -
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dan, that's a good one, sounds all right also for the Rollers!

For OEI and TEI, wouldn't it be fair to say about

OEI +7%
TEI +15%

Not that you are supposed to fly by the numbers, but it sure helps in initial training to have an aim to go for.

I also vote for N1 for target, as regarding the figures for fuel flow, EPR and N1, N1 is the only one the pilots have for all engine types (as far as I know).

Funny how the sim in BOH is so much different to fly than the one in MAD, not enginewise but stick and rudder. Which one would be closest to the real thing?
LGB is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.