B744 Air Systems
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Farnham, UK
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
B744 Air Systems
Question for jumbo experts......
What difference does it make with APU/Engine air via pack being supplied compared with an external condtioned air source?
Particularly interested in how equipment cooling differs.
Background is that we had a couple of defects - Equip Cooling supply fan u/s and APU u/s. Our paperwork indicted that on the ground with high OAT we had to supply pack air for equipment cooling purposes. With the APU u/s, some people reckoned that an engine would have to be run, others reckoned that ground conditioning would do an adaquate job others
Any thoughts....
T'bug
What difference does it make with APU/Engine air via pack being supplied compared with an external condtioned air source?
Particularly interested in how equipment cooling differs.
Background is that we had a couple of defects - Equip Cooling supply fan u/s and APU u/s. Our paperwork indicted that on the ground with high OAT we had to supply pack air for equipment cooling purposes. With the APU u/s, some people reckoned that an engine would have to be run, others reckoned that ground conditioning would do an adaquate job others
Any thoughts....
T'bug
Usual disclaimers apply!
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: EGGW
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What difference does it make with APU/Engine air via pack being supplied compared with an external condtioned air source?
Interestingly enough the AMM states that even with a fully serviceable equipment cooling system, supplemental cooling (pack or ground cart) should be provided if the OAT is >115f, and with one fan off the requirement drops to an OAT of >85f.
The cabin temperature is significantly higher than the OAT especially with all the IFE/lighting/galleys etc, and as the equipment cooling supply comes from cabin air it is a good idea to get some efficient cabin cooling running.
Last edited by gas path; 28th Oct 2004 at 10:03.
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sufficient equipment cooling is provided with even a single pack running under normal conditions, and 2 packs run from the APU can cool the entire airplane on a reasonable day. though all 3 packs can be run from the APU, for some reason our engineers tell us it's not a good idea (there are no restrictions in our FHB or FOM).
There are several different configurations, so whether the cockpit and equipment cooling fans run automatically or are needed in any specific ground configuration varies.
With an u/s APU and equipment cooling fan, you will have to look at your DDPG to determine the requirements for your particular configuration. A single ground-source A/C hose may not provide enough airflow in MANY situations, and 2 hoses may be required on hot days. I've had widely varying luck at different airports with regard to performance of ground A/C units, so beware...
There are several different configurations, so whether the cockpit and equipment cooling fans run automatically or are needed in any specific ground configuration varies.
With an u/s APU and equipment cooling fan, you will have to look at your DDPG to determine the requirements for your particular configuration. A single ground-source A/C hose may not provide enough airflow in MANY situations, and 2 hoses may be required on hot days. I've had widely varying luck at different airports with regard to performance of ground A/C units, so beware...
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Intruder - one of the reasons for killing 1 pack on the ground is that during days with high humidity and temps, the fwd cabin tends to rain from the hatrack grilles and if you have too low a cooling demand dialed in, you may even hear what sounds like rats having a dance party behind the left hand side upperdeck stowages as ice pellets make their way through the cockpit delivery ducts. Apart from the above, it needs to be a VERY uncomfortable day before 2 packs on a B744 can't cope so why burn gas for the sake of a 3rd pack ? Have a look at your pack mass flows and you'll probably find that the total of 2 versus 3 isn't that much different. Look after the cents and the dollars look after themselves in this case as you save fuel as a bonus. 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With 2 packs only running they both go to hi flow, with 3 they don't, 2 packs running on hi flow on the ground is more effecient than running 3 on normal flow. This is on the ground using apu air not in the air.
