Starting/Cruising
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Starting/Cruising
Dear all,
what do you monitor on startup and in cruise - EPR or N1 or N3?
Do you understand EPR and do you find it difficult to control to?
what would you like to control to? Personally i think percentage thrust would be a good display. Thoughts?
cheers
stu
what do you monitor on startup and in cruise - EPR or N1 or N3?
Do you understand EPR and do you find it difficult to control to?
what would you like to control to? Personally i think percentage thrust would be a good display. Thoughts?
cheers
stu
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Big Sky Country
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EGT and Oil pressure should be the two main inds you monitor at start up. As for EPR vs. N1 you shouldn't have a problem to control to either if you have a serviceable engine!!
Bottums Up
Start up
Cruise
- Ignition on, starter operating,
- N2, to know when to add fuel,
- 1001, 1002, 1003.... light off by 1010,
- N1 increasing,
- Oil Pressure rising,
- N2 rising,
- Rate of TGT rise to abort if overtemp,
- out of periferal vision, Low Oil Press unnunciator, extinguish,
- Starter Operating light out,
- Ground Idle N2 within limits.
Cruise
- N1, no EPR gauges,
- Oil press/temp,
- N2, TGT, Fuel flow.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
stuharri2002,
The 2 previous posters here have come up with good common-sense parameters to monitor during start, even with engines with Auto-Start / Auto-Start Protection, good airmanship and cockpit management dictate that critical parameters be monitored.
EPR in it's simplest form of explanation is Pressure Out Vs Pressure In, not much more complex than that. It's no more difficult to control to than setting an N1, EGT, Fuel Flow or any other engine parameter.
I'm presently stuck with EPR, but would prefer N1. My primary dislike of EPR is the effect of icing on the credibility of EPR.
Personally I think percentage thrust would be a useless display. Jet engines are primarily limited by Pressure (monitored by EPR), Engine Speed (monitored by N1/N2/N3), and Turbine Temperature (monitored by EGT/TGT/JPT etc.). Setting to an actual value of thrust monitors none of these limitations.
Takeoff, MCT, and Climb thrust will be set to the most limiting of these 3 limitations. Cruise thrust will be 'as required' to maintain the scheduled Mach No. or CAS, within the limits of MCR of course.
During Approach, we all have an initial 'ball park' EPR / N1 / Fuel Flow to set for typical approach configuration and speed, and adjust thrust from there as required to satisfy the Speed Trend Vector, or CAS variation in the absence of a Speed Trend Vector.
Regards,
Smokey
The 2 previous posters here have come up with good common-sense parameters to monitor during start, even with engines with Auto-Start / Auto-Start Protection, good airmanship and cockpit management dictate that critical parameters be monitored.
Do you understand EPR and do you find it difficult to control to?
what would you like to control to?
Personally i think percentage thrust would be a good display
Takeoff, MCT, and Climb thrust will be set to the most limiting of these 3 limitations. Cruise thrust will be 'as required' to maintain the scheduled Mach No. or CAS, within the limits of MCR of course.
During Approach, we all have an initial 'ball park' EPR / N1 / Fuel Flow to set for typical approach configuration and speed, and adjust thrust from there as required to satisfy the Speed Trend Vector, or CAS variation in the absence of a Speed Trend Vector.
Regards,
Smokey
