why does the nose of a SEP go to the right when pwr is idle?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: middle earth
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
why does the nose of a SEP go to the right when pwr is idle?
I fully know the reasons why the nose goes up and to the left when pwr is added, however why does the nose go to the right when pwr is reduced. assuming amercian engine.
Super-Friendly Aviator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Reigate, UK
Age: 42
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Erm...the same reason as it goes left!?
It's the opposite effect surely. Increase power > increase torque > nose wants to slide left. Decrease power > decrease torque > less tendency to turn left therefore, all other things being equal (inc. control deflections administered by the pilot), nose slides right i.e. to an equilibrium position. The aircraft is designed as inherently stable and will want to return to its most stable position readily in this situation.
That's my take on things. I stand to be corrected though.
Regards,
V1R
P.S. I assume in some aircraft this sliding to the right does indeed happen!
It's the opposite effect surely. Increase power > increase torque > nose wants to slide left. Decrease power > decrease torque > less tendency to turn left therefore, all other things being equal (inc. control deflections administered by the pilot), nose slides right i.e. to an equilibrium position. The aircraft is designed as inherently stable and will want to return to its most stable position readily in this situation.
That's my take on things. I stand to be corrected though.
Regards,
V1R
P.S. I assume in some aircraft this sliding to the right does indeed happen!
For someone who claimed 'not to have flown a twin for ages' on 21 Aug 04, you seem to be asking some very basic questions on various forums, green dinosaur.
What type of licence do you hold, if any?
What type of licence do you hold, if any?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: middle earth
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well Beagle some of the best questions to ask are the most basic ones. These are the ones that typically get glossed over by textbooks and instructors alike. I'm well qualified I would like to add!!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: England
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Most of the Piper family of aircraft have the rudder fin set at about 3 degrees to the right of the aircraft center line. This might generate a right yaw/roll when the rudder trim is nuetral and S&L flight is estabilshed in flight.
I have never noticed this in flight-but I always have the slip ball trimmed central! Does this apply to the larger singles such as the Malibu Meridian, TBM700 and the PC12?
Mr L.
I have never noticed this in flight-but I always have the slip ball trimmed central! Does this apply to the larger singles such as the Malibu Meridian, TBM700 and the PC12?
Mr L.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: everywhere
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GD
Here goes... The yaw to the left, as you know comes from the increase slipstream corkscrewing over the fuselage and striking the left side of the vertical stabilizer. This effect is more pronounced at low speed/high power setting.
If you get the chance to look straight down on a light SEP, you'll get the answer. The vertical stabilizer is actually positioned at a slight angle off the centreline. Thus in cruise conditions, the yaw affect of the prop slipstream (trying to yaw you left)will be naturally countered by the built in 'twist' in the vertical stabilizer(trying to yaw you right). Should you suddenly reduce power, you have no slipstream but the vertical stabilizer (with rudder neutral) will yaw you to the right.
This right yaw is not as pronounced as the yaw to the left, and in the good ol'days, I'd apply slight right rudder to make my point. As a prudent pilot, you shouldn't be making these rapid power changes anyway, hence some pilots not noticing it, except during their PPL training days.
I never noticed it on the C208's, but then I wasn't looking for it and perhaps was just cancelling it without giving it too much thought. Obviuosly couldn't have been an issue.
PP
Here goes... The yaw to the left, as you know comes from the increase slipstream corkscrewing over the fuselage and striking the left side of the vertical stabilizer. This effect is more pronounced at low speed/high power setting.
If you get the chance to look straight down on a light SEP, you'll get the answer. The vertical stabilizer is actually positioned at a slight angle off the centreline. Thus in cruise conditions, the yaw affect of the prop slipstream (trying to yaw you left)will be naturally countered by the built in 'twist' in the vertical stabilizer(trying to yaw you right). Should you suddenly reduce power, you have no slipstream but the vertical stabilizer (with rudder neutral) will yaw you to the right.
This right yaw is not as pronounced as the yaw to the left, and in the good ol'days, I'd apply slight right rudder to make my point. As a prudent pilot, you shouldn't be making these rapid power changes anyway, hence some pilots not noticing it, except during their PPL training days.
I never noticed it on the C208's, but then I wasn't looking for it and perhaps was just cancelling it without giving it too much thought. Obviuosly couldn't have been an issue.
PP
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N. Europe
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ouch! The torque came out...
(Assuming the initial condition to be trimmed in pitch, roll and yaw and flying straight)
Engine torque acts along the prop shaft. This means it will attempt to roll you around the prop shaft on a power change – and that’s it. If you try to counter this roll tendency with aileron, this will create adverse yaw, the direction of which is left as an exercise for the reader.
Gyroscopic precession will not create yaw until there’s a pitch change.
P-factor will be there, unless the flight path vector is parallel to the prop shaft. The direction of the yaw will depend upon the angle of attack.
Now, the likely culprit: Helical prop wash. The slipstream from the propeller coils its way down the fuselage, striking the fin from one side, creating a side force on the fin. You trim to fly straight, then reduce power... and the strength of the slipstream is reduced. This side force reduces with it and you get... yaw.
Regards,
Fred
(Assuming the initial condition to be trimmed in pitch, roll and yaw and flying straight)
Engine torque acts along the prop shaft. This means it will attempt to roll you around the prop shaft on a power change – and that’s it. If you try to counter this roll tendency with aileron, this will create adverse yaw, the direction of which is left as an exercise for the reader.
Gyroscopic precession will not create yaw until there’s a pitch change.
P-factor will be there, unless the flight path vector is parallel to the prop shaft. The direction of the yaw will depend upon the angle of attack.
Now, the likely culprit: Helical prop wash. The slipstream from the propeller coils its way down the fuselage, striking the fin from one side, creating a side force on the fin. You trim to fly straight, then reduce power... and the strength of the slipstream is reduced. This side force reduces with it and you get... yaw.
Regards,
Fred
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Guy's,
Are we not forgetting about the assymetric thrust effect of a prop too?! I was always taught this was the main reason for yaw with changes in thrust. It is also responsible for the "ciritcal engine" of a twin that doesn't have counter-rotating prop's!
Regards,
Cuban_8
Are we not forgetting about the assymetric thrust effect of a prop too?! I was always taught this was the main reason for yaw with changes in thrust. It is also responsible for the "ciritcal engine" of a twin that doesn't have counter-rotating prop's!
Regards,
Cuban_8
By the way, the Jabiru engine at-least swings left. That would cover the Jabiru aircraft, these rather sexy new Spitfire replicas, and homebuilt using one of the Jabiru engines (the 2.2L and 3.3L being most common).
G
G