Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

P-3 Prop blades

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

P-3 Prop blades

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th September 2004 | 22:11
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Murica.
P-3 Prop blades

I took this picture of a P-3 prop blade the other day. This is obviously a somewhat dented blade...
The question is: How much would this affect the aircraft?

TIMTS is offline  
Old 10th September 2004 | 23:15
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 321
Likes: 4
From: Australia
I'm sure that if you looked at the other three blades on the hub, you would find they look very similar.
This is not a dent. It is erosion on the leading edge caused by salt and water from their low level over water operations.
Considering the overall incredible size of the blades (over 4 metres in diameter) this wear is not significant, although I don't remember seeing one with this amount of erosion.
dogcharlietree is offline  
Old 11th September 2004 | 04:13
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Murica.
The rest

Here is the rest of them...
They don't look that bad.



The reason this caught my eye is that I fly helicopters, and I know this sort of damage to a rotor would create some interesting vibrations. I guess this prop would vibrate some as well, but I could be totally wrong...
TIMTS is offline  
Old 11th September 2004 | 06:30
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
From: n/a
Youd be hard put to notice any extra vibration. There's already enough to go turn your coffee frothy.

The "dent" is probably a stone chip from landing (reverse thrust drags a lot of dust and debries up) the engineers will then have blended out the chip to prevent cracking.
Its very common and there is no overall effect on the aircraft performance.
We had loads of them and only 2 of our aircraft did low level so its not just errosion from salt water.
Daysleeper is offline  
Old 12th September 2004 | 01:43
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Labuan
I have a sorta similar Sensenich 2 blader mounted in my den. It had been used for years on a training aircraft operating off a gravel strip, so the engineers CONSTANTLY had to keep dressing back the tips and edges to bring some uniformity to the prop.

I flew the a/c it was attached to a few times, and a degree of vibration in excess of other aircraft in the fleet was noticeable, although that type of a/c vibrated a damned lot anyway!

The prop was finished off one day when a student pilot (a lady of german origin) took it up with an instructor for X-wind circuits. They managed on landing to actually dig the prop in (without any other damage except to the engine). Some weeks later, I saw it in the corner of the engineer's hangar, and after a little talking, it now hangs in my house - kind of an interesting talking point!
MkVIII is offline  
Old 12th September 2004 | 02:01
  #6 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 545
Likes: 1
From: Dunstable, Beds UK
There is a basic one third rule.
Inner third no damage.
second third some damage ( per the manual)
outer third fairly liberal damage including cropping in some cases up to 2 inches
Main thing is blending which is what you are seeing here to remove any nicks cracks or dings.
It is usually better to remove more material to get a smoother profile.
GotTheTshirt is offline  
Old 12th September 2004 | 10:09
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: the dark side of the moon!
I've been surprised in the past how much material can be removed from the fan blades in a CFM56 without any increase in vibration. The MM limit's are quite gemerous to say the least.

Eng
eng1170 is offline  
Old 15th September 2004 | 17:04
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
From: Erehwon
Sure looks like blending to me.

They used to take some startling lumps out of the blades of the C130s at Lyneham and presumably everywhere else too.

I also agree with the comment about the vibration would have to increase a whole lot for anyone to notice.

I used to run old bangers when I was on Hercules and when leaving the carpark to drive home - it felt like a Rolls Royce.

That should give you some idea.

The missing paint etc IS erosion or particle blasting from the environment these poor s*ds operate in.
Dengue_Dude is offline  
Old 15th September 2004 | 22:10
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: In an Airplane
Those are hamilton Standard props on that P-3. Used in conjunction with the Allison T56 (now RR) or 501 if you prefer.
On a Convair 580/5800 they are 13' 6" in diameter and you can really file down the tips.
privateer01 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.