Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

rough runways


Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

rough runways

Old 24th August 2004 | 10:30
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: NBO
rough runways

flown with a couple of guys who insist on using max t/o thrust on rough runways even at sea level when ther'es room for huge reductions, such as bombay. i think it's unjustifiable.

does anyone know of any recommended practices for operating out of runways that have seen better days on modern jets?
kichwa tembo is offline  
Old 24th August 2004 | 13:05
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
From: Gold Coast
We do that operating out of Penang.
The runway is pretty darn rough indeed there, and if you use the full reduction allowed then there would be very little runway left at Vr.
We have a company memo out stating that full thrust must always be used there - But we normnally wouldn't get a lot of reduction there anyway due to the weights we operate at.
As for lighter weight planes, at say Bombay, I don't know. If the Captain decided to use something between the appropriate reduction and full thrust and something went wrong then he's be in a spot of bother all right.
If in doubt, go for full thrust ...
18-Wheeler is offline  
Old 25th August 2004 | 18:03
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Norway
....plus a little more flap maybe??
Norwegian wood is offline  
Old 26th August 2004 | 01:44
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: vancouver oldebloke
Full thrust and flap increase all reduce the groundroll pounding,as per reduced Vis ops and contaminated runway ops,thats what it's for-get up and go!!
cheers......
oldebloke is offline  
Old 31st August 2004 | 12:08
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: NBO
thanks a lot guys.

if in doubt max thrust. it makes complete sense. being too academic i guess- i.e. trying to quantify an unknown
kichwa tembo is offline  
Old 1st September 2004 | 10:54
  #6 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 4,698
Likes: 1,305
From: Australia
There was an atoll in the Central Pacific that was extremely rough.
Full thrust was used in combination with flap 25 in the 737-200 in those days. We would look at flap 15 or flap 25 which both gave a significant reduction in VR compared to flap 5 or flap1. We are talking about 13 knots or more.
Centaurus is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.