one for the aerodynamics forum
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For a FAR.25 certified aircraft, paragraphs 25.147 (Directional and lateral control) and 25.177 (Static lateral-directional stability) together effectively require that the aircraft be safe and controllable (as defined in the details of the paras) up to full rudder angle or high pedal forces, whichever is encountered first.
Therefore, aerodynamically, any FAR25 certified aircraft can be sideslipped to the maximum rudder capability throughout the flight envelope. (JAR 25 rules are similar, and the rules haven't changed a huge amount, so that statement is pretty much generally applicable)
There are, howvere, other limitations of the designs which may limit the capability of the aircraft: fuel systems, for example, may not be designed for sustained lateral acceleration and lateral fuel migration and engine fuel starvation may result from a sustained sideslip.
Other assumptions used during the design may also be violated if the aircraft is routinely sideslipped - loading cases for e.g. gusts usually assume that the initial aircraft condition is trimmed wings level; a design-limiting gust acting on a sideslipping aircraft could conceivably exceed the design loads for the aircraft. And, of course, this assumes a slow and steady control application - stamping on the rudder at high speeds is never a good idea.
These requirements are met through demonstration in certification flight test.
And the DFDR will probably reveal what was going on if someone bothers to check - lateral acceleration and rudder angle are usually recorded, and will be a fairly conclusive indication of what was going on.
Therefore, aerodynamically, any FAR25 certified aircraft can be sideslipped to the maximum rudder capability throughout the flight envelope. (JAR 25 rules are similar, and the rules haven't changed a huge amount, so that statement is pretty much generally applicable)
There are, howvere, other limitations of the designs which may limit the capability of the aircraft: fuel systems, for example, may not be designed for sustained lateral acceleration and lateral fuel migration and engine fuel starvation may result from a sustained sideslip.
Other assumptions used during the design may also be violated if the aircraft is routinely sideslipped - loading cases for e.g. gusts usually assume that the initial aircraft condition is trimmed wings level; a design-limiting gust acting on a sideslipping aircraft could conceivably exceed the design loads for the aircraft. And, of course, this assumes a slow and steady control application - stamping on the rudder at high speeds is never a good idea.
These requirements are met through demonstration in certification flight test.
And the DFDR will probably reveal what was going on if someone bothers to check - lateral acceleration and rudder angle are usually recorded, and will be a fairly conclusive indication of what was going on.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sideslipping Heavies
Presume the questioner wants to know whether sideslippng a heavy is a useful manoeuvre.
Effective flaps and high lift devices which also substantially increase drag have long since negated any usefulness from sideslipping to increase an angle of descent.
So there is a lot of consideration in design to keep sideslipping to a minimum. It increases drag and particularly with swept wings introduces strong rolling forces.
Maximum sideslipping for a multi engined aircraft usually occurs at Vmca when the pilot will have maximum rudder input that he can provide to offset asymmetric thrust.
There may still be the odd aircraft around which suffers from rudder overbalance. This is nasty and in the worst case will cause the rudder to lock hard over. TPs approach that area very carefully.
Presume the questioner wants to know whether sideslippng a heavy is a useful manoeuvre.
Effective flaps and high lift devices which also substantially increase drag have long since negated any usefulness from sideslipping to increase an angle of descent.
So there is a lot of consideration in design to keep sideslipping to a minimum. It increases drag and particularly with swept wings introduces strong rolling forces.
Maximum sideslipping for a multi engined aircraft usually occurs at Vmca when the pilot will have maximum rudder input that he can provide to offset asymmetric thrust.
There may still be the odd aircraft around which suffers from rudder overbalance. This is nasty and in the worst case will cause the rudder to lock hard over. TPs approach that area very carefully.
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: what U.S. calls Žold EuropeŽ
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Two obviously very good pilots already demonstrated, that it can be done, and saved an aircraft that way.
The 767 that ran out of fuel in 1983 was landed using a sideslip, as the spoilers were not available.
The complete story can be read
here
The 767 that ran out of fuel in 1983 was landed using a sideslip, as the spoilers were not available.
Six miles out Pearson began his final approach onto what was formerly RCAFB Gimli. Pearson says his attention was totally concentrated on the airspeed indicator from this point on. Approaching runway 32L he realized he was too high and too fast, and slowed to 180 knots. Lacking divebrakes, he did what any sailplane pilot would do: He crossed the controls and threw the 767 into a vicious sideslip. Slips are normally avoided on commercial flights because of the the tremendous buffeting it creates, unnerving passengers. As he put the plane into a slip some of Flight 143's passengers ended up looking at nothing but blue sky, the others straight down at a golf course. Says Quintal, "It was an odd feeling. The left wing was down, so I was up compared to Bob. I sort of looked down at him, not sideways anymore."
here
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maximum sideslipping for a multi engined aircraft usually occurs at Vmca when the pilot will have maximum rudder input that he can provide to offset asymmetric thrust.
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sideslip angle on landing in a crosswind will also be limited by the angle at which the wingtip or engine pod/prop will hit the ground. In the 744, that's about 8 degrees. For very heavy crosswind, crab is used in conjunction with a slip of 5 deg max, and the airplane can be landed in the crab. Inertia straightens out the airplane on the runway very nicely, as long as you are tracking straight at touchdown.
