Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Airbus FBW family - flight plan predictions

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Airbus FBW family - flight plan predictions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th July 2004 | 07:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: UK
Airbus FBW family - flight plan predictions

Please would anyone advise:

When a flight plan is first loaded and altitude constraints are shown the intervening waypoints altutdes are then predicted.

In the climb phase will a predicted altitude ever be higher than a subsequent constraint?

Similarly on descent will a predicted waypoint ever be lower than a subsequent constraint.

The answer would seem obvious (that a smooth path is always predicted) but I have been advised that this is not always the case.

Many thanks
AirbusFan is offline  
Old 11th July 2004 | 20:15
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
From: UK
It all depends on what the entered constraint requires.

If, during the climb for eg, the constraint is a minimum altitude by point x, but the aircraft can achieve higher, then the prediction will be higher than the constraint. Similar, but in reverse of course, for the descent.

If the constraint requires 'AT' a particular height (and it's achievable!) then prediction will be exactly that.

Hope this helps.
FlapsOne is offline  
Old 12th July 2004 | 15:18
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: _
AirbusFan, out of curiosity could you please elaborate on the instances you've been told of where the system logic doesn't behave as expected? Is it a pilot/engineer that told you of these accounts? I'm just interested to hear how such an inherently simple piece of system logic can go wrong, it seems strange.

Thanks in advance
Port Strobe is offline  
Old 12th July 2004 | 20:58
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: UK
Thanks for your help and interest.

I think it may be more a case of third hand mis-communication.
FlapsOne has confirmed my understanding.

Is the logic really that simple?
AirbusFan is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.