Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Runway incursions - Rejected Take offs

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Runway incursions - Rejected Take offs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th April 2004 | 19:20
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Andover
Thumbs up Runway incursions - Rejected Take offs

Im doing a Thesis on runway incursions and rehjected take offs, although this sounds quite vauge does anybody have any particular areas that they as a pilot see there being a problem and needs looking serious look into. the other thing was does anybody have any idea of airport or airline reporting schemes where i can get some good solid data for this project???
Vik
vikvallabh82 is offline  
Old 27th April 2004 | 21:36
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: USA
Go to google.com and type "runway incursions" in the search window. Tons of stuff there.
non sched is offline  
Old 27th April 2004 | 21:48
  #3 (permalink)  
niknak
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
From: UK
Runway incursions are a big thing with the UK CAA at the moment, if you contact the CAA Safety Regulation Group, they will be able to give you loads of information.
niknak is offline  
Old 27th April 2004 | 21:55
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
From: CYYC
There was an incident at Calgary International (CYYC) a couple of years ago. A student pilot took off on an intersecting runway and forced an A320 to abort take-off. It turns out the student was confused about what the tower had cleared him for. Mixing training traffic with large commercial traffic does have some issues to look at. I learned to fly at CYYC and think it gave me some great experience, but there are definitely some risks that need to be addressed.

This has been a big topic in the US recently and there have been a few articles on AvWeb about it. I'm sure the FAA site would have some information.

goates

Last edited by goates; 27th April 2004 at 22:22.
goates is offline  
Old 28th April 2004 | 08:25
  #5 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 20
From: My views - Not my employer!
737 vs Puma at ABZ here
Cough is offline  
Old 29th April 2004 | 16:43
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
From: South East UK
Vikvallabh82:


You might want to study the incursion-related RTO which happened at Naples on the day you posted your question. Good timing.
Kalium Chloride is offline  
Old 29th April 2004 | 19:22
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: .
In 1989-1990, the Air Transport Association (ATA) and the Aerospace Industries Association (AIA) formed a group to study the RTQ overrun problem. The group was called the RTO Safety Task Force and consisted of airlines, pilot associations, government, regulatory agencies, and airframe manufacturers.
A Training package “the Takeoff Safe Training Aid” was developed.
This is available as video, CD and various paper manuals from NTIS. Boeing operators can download it from myboeingfleet.com
80/20 is offline  
Old 4th May 2004 | 14:28
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Andover
Thanks for all your help guys anyone else out there with there tow bits to say, i talked to the CAA yest. and the guy i spoke to was very helpful ill keep the board upto date so if u wanna know how it turns out in the end keep comin back and youer see. cheers all
Vik.
vikvallabh82 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.