Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Swing-wings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Apr 2004, 12:44
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: LPPT
Age: 58
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Swing-wings

Just a thought...

Would it be feasable to use the swing-wing concept on civil aircrafts?

Just came to mind after looking at the Rockwell B-1, and picturing it as a civil/commercial aircraft, possibly a good substitute for the Concorde?

Any comments?
GearDown&Locked is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2004, 13:41
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Suitcase....
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Already been tried. Called B2707! One of the problems was the swing wing mechanism was too heavy and really impacted payload. Granted that was in the mid 60's and perhaps new technology would make a difference.
Phil Squares is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2004, 13:46
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,789
Received 45 Likes on 21 Posts
Note that:-

1) It was only ever used on supersonic aircraft, so unless another SST comes along, there is no need for it.

2) Even on military aircraft it hasn't been on any new design since the seventies...there are simpler, lighter and better ways to achieve the same thing (efficiency over a wider speed range) using modern aerodynanics.
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2004, 15:20
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
B2707 Boeing? A bit late again: Barnes Wallis – Swallow 1950s
safetypee is online now  
Old 13th Apr 2004, 17:21
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Suitcase....
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I'm not mistaken the B 2707 was the first transport category aircraft to incorporate swing wing design. I think that is what the original post referred to.
Phil Squares is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2004, 18:50
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Dorset
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is certainly true that current man made variable geometry technology is too heavy to be commercially viable. But almost every flying creature past and present has used variable geometry of one form or another. We still have a great deal to learn from the great skunkworks in the sky!!
Keith.Williams. is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2004, 08:50
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: LPPT
Age: 58
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keith Williams

In fact we already have some variable geometry present in the everyday aircraft through the use of flaps, slats, etc

I get the feeling that I'm talking rubbish , or science fiction, when I refer to this subject. Am I thinking in the wrong direction ?

Thanks everyone for your comments
GearDown&Locked is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2004, 12:25
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,789
Received 45 Likes on 21 Posts
GD&L,

Not rubbish. As has been stated, both the great Barnes Wallace and Boeing designed aircraft with variable geometry for supersonic flight.


HOWEVER, it is not a panecea and supersonic commercial flight is still not a practical proposition, be it blended delta or swing wing.
Wizofoz is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.