Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

EverGreen 747 Water Drop movie

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

EverGreen 747 Water Drop movie

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th April 2004 | 17:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
Talking EverGreen 747 Water Drop movie

This was found on www.airtanker.com and I thought you all would get a kick out of it:

www.everzone.org/down/highaltitudedrop.wmv
allyn is offline  
Old 9th April 2004 | 19:45
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: India
Yeah sure it was awesome !
Never seen a photo of a 747 doing tha job.
Only question is, why at such a high altitude ?????
Any guesses ?

YA
Joles
Joles is offline  
Old 9th April 2004 | 20:29
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Bedfordshire
Think the drop was at high altitude because the 747 was in the process of being certified as a water bomber.
Better to do it at high altitude as the weight and balance changes dramatically when the water/retardant is dropped - you've got a bit more air to play with!
No comment is offline  
Old 9th April 2004 | 20:53
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
From: UK
I'm surprised it is thought to be effective. Loading time must be considerable. The 747 is not a beast to be landed quickly, or departed quickly with the potential for massive trim problems. Frequency over target would not be very high. Now that Russian Beriev flying boat, loading up by skimming over a lake or in a high speed run in the water, then lifting off would be back over target far more rapidly (if there was a lake!) with a good load.
Notso Fantastic is offline  
Old 10th April 2004 | 12:19
  #5 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
20 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,843
Likes: 328
From: Hertfordshire, UK.
This topic was running in a different thread last week. IIRC, the conversion is setting up multiple container tanks for faster loading and selected drop. i.e. you might have some with retardant and some with water and can release part load on each pass.

The conversion also plans to keep the a/c within it's original design parameters. This means dropping at a higher altitude (obviously not as high as in the test) and so the tanks are pressurised to make the drop more focused and this appears to be the case with the test shown in the movie. You can see a jet directing downwards.

They hope that the capacity of the a/c, dropping sequentially in two (or more) passes, will offset the limiting factors of loading. But I sit to be corrected on all of the above.

Why do this? Hey, what else are they gonna do with all those '47s when the 380 takes over ...
PAXboy is offline  
Old 10th April 2004 | 22:26
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: USA
I know the crew that is doing the test flying and was told that there are no real trim problems... The film clip is just a normal drop no pressure.. They are now at low level pressure drops and things are still going well.
sidman is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.