Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

wake turbulence, forward pressure or G-A?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

wake turbulence, forward pressure or G-A?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Mar 2004, 15:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Wake turbulence. Forward pressure or G-A?

I was in wake turbulence on finals.
Some people said to go around, some said to pitch forward.
How do you decide?
My current thinking is go-around.
Any arguments for lowering your nose and descending out of it?

172 pilot here.

Last edited by lineboy_nz; 29th Mar 2004 at 16:20.
lineboy_nz is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2004, 16:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation Forward pressure only if inverted...

...or nearly so.

The reason forward pressure is taught is because a natural reaction is to pull back on the yoke if you're descending.

But if you're upside down and descending and you pull back, you'll point the nose straight at the ground.

Another thing to consider, the vortex sinks at a fairly constant rate (about 900fpm). You may not want to descend back into it for another encounter.

But if you pull back, your airspeed will deteriorate, placing you closer to the stall and degrade your control effectiveness.

Lots of things to consider. Every situation is different.

One thing you should always know before you follow a larger airplane is the wind direction.

If it's calm, you can expect nice stable vortices. If you have strong gusts, the vortices will break up and drift with the wind.

If you have a steady 10kt crosswind, the downwind vortex will travel downwind but the upwind vortex will remain stationary.

Of course the best advice is to avoid the wake altogether but sometimes we just get caught. In that case you have to make some very fast calculations and judgements.

There are no hard and fast rules--only good and bad judgement.

Fly safe.
zerozero is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2004, 16:47
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dubai
Age: 39
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if it exists at goes all the way down to the runway so unless you can land before the larger aircraft i would not suggest it

Go around you've got more height to play with and get out of trouble
nosewheelfirst is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2004, 16:57
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thats what i thought. my aerodrome has heavy helicopters doing IFR approaches to the active runway. is this ideal for pre-PPL (A) students on night VFR training?
lineboy_nz is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2004, 19:09
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: An Island Province
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Assuming that from your good airmanship you should have been above the flight path of the preceding aircraft – planning to land long if at all; then the appropriate action would be to pull up to remain above the vortex and to go around to reposition for a stable approach after the vortex has dissipated.

For a nice simple guide to Wake Turbulence see: Wake Turbulence, go to Safety Information / Publications / Wake Turbulence.

Also see UK CAA GENERAL AVIATION SAFETY SENSE LEAFLET 15B Wake Vortex, cannot find a link, and FAA AC 90-23E.
alf5071h is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.