Advantages of Pod engines
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I can think of three at the moment:
a) Not as noisy as fuselage mounted engines.
b) More space! Would be pretty interesting to see the engines of the 777-300ER mounted on the fuselage
c) If more than 2 engines are mounted side-by-side on the fuselage (ie 4 engines in total), a fire could spread more easily than on the wing.
Disadvante would be the yaw effect if an engine failed on one side.
Regards,
Mark
a) Not as noisy as fuselage mounted engines.
b) More space! Would be pretty interesting to see the engines of the 777-300ER mounted on the fuselage
c) If more than 2 engines are mounted side-by-side on the fuselage (ie 4 engines in total), a fire could spread more easily than on the wing.
Disadvante would be the yaw effect if an engine failed on one side.
Regards,
Mark
Do a Hover - it avoids G
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chichester West Sussex UK
Age: 91
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some advantages, of which the first one probably tops any list:
The weight of the engines reduces the wing tip up bending effects of lift allowing a lighter wing structure.
It may be a little easier to arrange for a suitable structural fuse that allows the engine to break free from a wing pylon under engine seizure or other severe event.
Routine maintenance access can be easier as the engines are likely to be closer to the ground.
Although engines are normally certificated on the basis that they will contain any blades they shed, this does not always happen in practice. Moving the engines out on the wing can help following such an event. Certainly the closer engines are together the easier it is for a bad structural event in one to damage another.
The whole business of choosing an overall aircraft configuration is a compromise of many issues.
The weight of the engines reduces the wing tip up bending effects of lift allowing a lighter wing structure.
It may be a little easier to arrange for a suitable structural fuse that allows the engine to break free from a wing pylon under engine seizure or other severe event.
Routine maintenance access can be easier as the engines are likely to be closer to the ground.
Although engines are normally certificated on the basis that they will contain any blades they shed, this does not always happen in practice. Moving the engines out on the wing can help following such an event. Certainly the closer engines are together the easier it is for a bad structural event in one to damage another.
The whole business of choosing an overall aircraft configuration is a compromise of many issues.
Also it makes life much easier for the designer to change what engine is fitted, since by and large only the pod needs a redesign, not large chunks of primary aircraft structure. Can you imagine the task of installing a bigger engine in a DH Comet.
And it saves a complete re-think on CG positioning if a sunstantially heavier (or lighter) engine is fitted later, podded engines are pretty close to the CG operating range, tailmounted engines are not.
G
And it saves a complete re-think on CG positioning if a sunstantially heavier (or lighter) engine is fitted later, podded engines are pretty close to the CG operating range, tailmounted engines are not.
G
ENTREPPRUNEUR
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The 60s
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To clarify what John Farley is saying, putting the engine on the wing spreads weight away from the fuselage which allows the wing to be less rigid, On the wing they can be stuffed out in front to provide a bending moment about the wing axis which again means you can make the wing less strong.
Probably the only reasons planes don't have them on the wing are:
1) you need a taller/heavier landing gear
2) you need a bigger tail to compensate for engine failure at low speed.
Probably the only reasons planes don't have them on the wing are:
1) you need a taller/heavier landing gear
2) you need a bigger tail to compensate for engine failure at low speed.
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: 1060 West Addison
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A few other benefits include fuel delivery to the engine: easier when its hung under the fuel tanks in the wing/centrebox and there can also be advantages from the pylons acting as wing fences, allowing aerodynamicists to do even less work;-)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The VC-10 (4 aft fuselage mounted RR Conways) has specially shaped main-gear tyres, which prevent water from the runway being thrown up and ingested by the engines. This isn't an issue with pod mounted engines.
Hate to disagree Mark;
I think it was a LOT quieter in the front of the cabin of a Diesel 9 or 727 compared to a 767, A300, 737 etc.
Just my thoughts :-)
a) Not as noisy as fuselage mounted engines.
Just my thoughts :-)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi DCT,
I have to admit, I only have MD80 "experience", haven't been on a 727 for a very long time.
What I mean is that sitting in the rear in a MD80 is much louder than sitting "on the wing" of a 737/767 etc.
Regards,
Mark
I have to admit, I only have MD80 "experience", haven't been on a 727 for a very long time.
What I mean is that sitting in the rear in a MD80 is much louder than sitting "on the wing" of a 737/767 etc.
Regards,
Mark
Some relevant stuff at this thread: http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthr...ounted+engines
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bris, QLD, Australia
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have read that Boeing pioneered the use of pod mounted engines to meet a US Military requirement, that a catastrophic engine failure should not jeopardise any major structural components.
Also, when Boeing engineers first saw details of the Comet, they were rather 'amused' by the engine location !!
Also, when Boeing engineers first saw details of the Comet, they were rather 'amused' by the engine location !!
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In addition to the structural wing bending relief mentioned above, pod mounted engines, when suspended far forward of the wing, can provide a substantial additional amount of aeroelastic relief.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: LPPT
Age: 58
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Out of simple observation, wouldn't it be a major point against POD mounted engines, if the a/c finds itself in a landing gear faillure situation, and has to make a belly-landing?
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: The Beautiful South
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Geardown&locked.......(or not as in this case 
)
Underslung pod engines will usually depart from the airframe due to forces which will shear the "fuse pins" . Part of the design for just this event.
)Underslung pod engines will usually depart from the airframe due to forces which will shear the "fuse pins" . Part of the design for just this event.
