piston fuel consumption?
Thread Starter
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: temporarily unsure :-)
piston fuel consumption?
i heard from a mate of mine that any piston engined a/c's average fuel consumption in gph can be adduced by taking ten percent of the max.horsepower,and dividing by two.this is certainly true for the c172 series 1 acft,giving a gph of 8.anyone else heard of this formula for average fuel consumtion & is it reliable?
Thread Starter
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: temporarily unsure :-)
thanks! its actually quite scary because the flight manuals are all based on new acft operating at optimum conditions-and the figures given there are often far off the mark.going by the book,for example,a 2.2hr flight at density alt of 10000' with one t/o and 1 landing gives something like a 5.8 gph consumption as an average,whereas in reality in the conditions i operate under,you're looking more at an actual measured consumption of about 7.8gph!
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 2
From: UK
Fuel consumption obviously depends on power setting but since you're turning chemical energy in the Avgas into useful work, you'd expect the energy you get out of a gallon to be predictable.
I'd estimate that you can get 14 horsepower hours per US gallon from a properly leaned engine. So for example a 200 hp IO-360 running at 70% power should cost you 10 USG/hr.
I'd estimate that you can get 14 horsepower hours per US gallon from a properly leaned engine. So for example a 200 hp IO-360 running at 70% power should cost you 10 USG/hr.
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Brazil
HP/GPH
John Deakins says:
for aspirated engines (8,5:1 compression ratio) - 14,9HP/GPH
for fire breathing turbos (7,5:1 compression ratio) - 13,7HP/GPH
Observation: those numbers are for lean of peak operation only
THE mandatory link for everyone who wants to lear A LOT about recips: http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/182146-1.html
Thank´s John. You made much much less ignorant.
for aspirated engines (8,5:1 compression ratio) - 14,9HP/GPH
for fire breathing turbos (7,5:1 compression ratio) - 13,7HP/GPH
Observation: those numbers are for lean of peak operation only
THE mandatory link for everyone who wants to lear A LOT about recips: http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/182146-1.html
Thank´s John. You made much much less ignorant.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 3
From: Arizona USA
Fuel consumption-
Genarally speaking, for turbo and non-turbocharged piston engines, figure...one half pound of fuel per HP per hour.
Again, generally speaking, the only exception to this was with the CurtisWright R3350 DA/EA series turbocompound piston engines which had three Power Recovery Turbines (exhaust driven) fitted, which provided extra power directly to the crankshaft via fluid couplings. With these engines, the fuel consumption was (approximately) .36 pounds of fuel per HP per hour.
However these engines, in order to be operated as designed absolutely required 115/145 avgas, generally not available today.
The longest range piston engine airliner was fitted with these very advanced engines, the Lockheed 1649A Constellation.
23 hours endurance....provided you did not run out of oil.
A superb aircraft.
Again, generally speaking, the only exception to this was with the CurtisWright R3350 DA/EA series turbocompound piston engines which had three Power Recovery Turbines (exhaust driven) fitted, which provided extra power directly to the crankshaft via fluid couplings. With these engines, the fuel consumption was (approximately) .36 pounds of fuel per HP per hour.
However these engines, in order to be operated as designed absolutely required 115/145 avgas, generally not available today.
The longest range piston engine airliner was fitted with these very advanced engines, the Lockheed 1649A Constellation.
23 hours endurance....provided you did not run out of oil.
A superb aircraft.
Last edited by 411A; 8th February 2004 at 10:28.





